The Federal Trade Commission on Monday sued to block a proposed merger between grocery giants Kroger and Albertsons, saying the $24.6 billion deal could result in higher prices for millions of American consumers.

The FTC filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Oregon, alleging that the deal is anticompetitive and could harm shoppers by boosting prices for groceries and other essential household items. The merger could also result in lower quality products and services, as well as limit shoppers’ options for where to buy groceries, the agency alleged.

The FTC was joined in the suit by eight state attorneys general and the District of Columbia.

  • assembly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    4 months ago

    I feel like this is a pretty obvious circumstance where these companies should not merge as it would have zero positive impact on consumers. Hoping they can keep the merger from going through. If they can’t block this one the. I kinda feel like they don’t have much authority.

    • Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      We already saw how little power they have with the MS/Activision merger. Doubt they’ll be able to do anything here either.

      • quicksand@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 months ago

        I feel like there’s more on the line with groceries being a staple necessary for human existence, so hopefully there’s more motivation to stop this one. Your example stands though and I don’t have a whole lot of faith that this will turn out different.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          You’re right that there is more on the line, but that doesn’t mean the morons in power will care.

          • gila@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            Here in Aus we’ve had a supermarket duopoly since 1985, it has been terrible for consumers and only gets worse over time, most recently using COVID supply chain disruptions as a guise for increasing sales margin.

            The government recently announced a 12-month review into the industry, triggering CEOs to resign and be replaced with scapegoats for their upcoming difficult period.

            Things do generally seem to be on the right path, and yet still no one is talking about the only measure which will stop the problem: fixing the merger laws.

            From where I’m standing, for the FTC to pre-emptively realise this eventuality and act to intervene represents about a 40-year headstart on us developing sensible policy in the area. And we’ve actually been dealing with the consequences of the inaction for that time.

            Comparing to Activision and Microsoft is total non sequitur, they are world apart in terms of their impact on society and tbh, Microsoft’s argument that it can be good for consumers has merit.

            • TruthAintEasy@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              You Aussies seem to be a lot like us Canadians: terrifying abroad in wartime, utterly complacent domestically in peace times. Does that track?

              I have an Aussie nefew btw, I miss that lil guy. Much love, take care

              • gila@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                If you ask me there was definitely a shift during and since the cold war era as our historically progressive parliament started trimming off and shunning its more socialist members and ideas. It follows the the cycle of exploitation following abundance. The Herd put it pretty well in their song 77% (indirectly about separate issues to do with the complacency of Aus voting constituency) - “We rode the sheep’s back, now the sheep ride you” (the country got rich off of the rise of agricultural development esp. wool industry during 60s and the primary beneficiaries are now oligarchs)

  • TruthAintEasy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Late stage capitalism just cant help but create monopolies. But they dont really need to, they just have to all quietly agree to raise prices based on cost and simply never lower them regardless of that cost decreasing. Weird how the spot price of grain can go up or down but a loaf of bread only goes up. Why even bother with being competitive when you can just raise prices and stagnate wages while asking for government hand outs?

    The rich already have socialism, the public pays for their losses and often even their investment costs indirectly via buisness grants etc. but the profits are privatized.

    New arena, anyone?