• Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yup - God forbid poor folks have nice things rather than funneling every penny they earn to the rich to satisfy their ever-increasing hunger for money.

    The average person earns £1,000,000 in their lifetime, and I struggle to see the justification in anyone, and I mean anyone being worth 100s, 1000s, or even over 100,000 human lifetimes.

    It’s sickening to see hard-working people having to fight month after month to survive on meager earnings while some dickheads are out there buying megayachts that cost a human lifetime per year just to maintain.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    i’m all for not shaming people and everything, but we also do need to be conscious about what we’re buying and consuming.

    You probably don’t need a macbook, and if you do need a laptop, there are almost certainly better options that are cheaper, and more repairable. Please don’t buy a macbook, they aren’t good products. (though now with M series macs they actually do work, kind of)

    consumerism is not good, we shouldn’t be encouraging it. We should be encouraging conscious spending.

  • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I don’t shame people for buying unnecessary things. But, I will think you are a little stupid if you are nearly starving but have a brand new car. You aren’t responsible for the system you live in, but you can at least try to make it a little better for yourself.

    I’m not talking about people that just spend some money for something they like, quality of life is important. I mean people that will literally cripple themselves financially just for a status symbol. Especially if you have people that rely on you.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Brand new luxury car is perhaps more apt for your example.

      Can be hard to find a way to pay monthly for used cars, I believe, vs. plentiful options for installments on new ones.

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The best part is they’ll raise prices due to “inflation” or whatever, then when supply increases…the prices don’t go down!

        I’m honestly wondering what the end game is for these MBA asshats ruining everything. Is it really that many people so selfish and myopic that we have to suffocate on this one planet and never reach?

      • Chestnut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If the prices didn’t go up because of a shortage, because there was never a shortage, why did prices go back down again?

        The law of supply and demand explains the price of eggs. If you’re saying it’s wrong then what’s your better egg-splanation?

        • Supercritical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          The prices went back down right after the federal government announced a price fixing investigation and a bunch of news coverage came out about how their claims were bogus.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.”

      • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah they’re just like insects, we can grind them up into a fine powder and mix them into anything. They can’t argue with that because that’s what they want us to do anyway.

    • Gabe Bell@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, I think shaming rich people for exploiting the poor is behaving like decent human being. I think if more people did that society would be a much better place.

  • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    100% yes. And start shaming rich people for wanting us to eat bugs and live in coffins while they live in giant mansions and eat all the real food they want.

    • AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Bugs are a source of cheap protein too, and it’s more of a cultural thing that they are not prevalent in most western cuisine. And there’s nothing wrong with small apartments; there are more needed anyways, since people tend to live alone these days. If there were more small, cheap living spaces in the US, then the suburban carcentric design, where you can’t reach a grocery store without a car, would have real competition. Higher population density also helps out communities because of lower infrastructure costs.

      I’m not rich, but there’s nothing wrong with different food and small living spaces.

      • ArcoIris@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        To be more specific, there’s nothing wrong with those things being a CHOICE. The problem is with specific individuals telling people that millions of others need to cut their carbon footprint to near zero so that they, as an individual, can keep using their private jet without feeling guilty. And that attitude can go die in a hole. But you knew that.

  • XEAL@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Shame the rich who can waste money on a 100k Patek Philippe fucking watch.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m a lot less concerned about watches than about cars (much bigger environmental impact) and real estate (very closely tied to a huge chunk of most people’s livelihood).