• The House passed a more than $60 billion bill that provides more military aid to Ukraine.
  • It’s part of a larger foreign aid package that’s likely to pass the Senate and be signed into law.
  • 112 Republicans voted it against — the most ever, and a majority of the GOP conference.

Saturday’s vote marked the first time the House had approved billions of dollars in Ukraine aid since December 2022, when Democrats still controlled the chamber.

In the two years since Russia’s invasion, opposition to aiding Ukraine has grown from a fringe position to a majority view among House GOP lawmakers. Many argue the money should be spent domestically or that policy changes at the US-Mexico border should take precedence.

Here are the 112 House Republicans who voted against the bill.

  • Godric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Since rest of the thread is undirected anger without naming names, let’s name names!

  • avater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    well you got the names, now how about doing a little background check if there is some russki money lying somewhere in those traitors bank accounts…

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m doing background research and found a picture of biden laughing with medvedev and berlusconi. I guess it’s not just these 112 idiots who have ties with the mafia and russia but all of them are corrupted pigs in for the money and wealth

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If Biden is also taking bribe money from Russia, as you suggest, then we should expect him to veto this bill, right?

        Neoliberals are conservatives, but they usually are not outright traitors the way Republican conservatives are.

        • index@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          If Biden is also taking bribe money from Russia, as you suggest, then we should expect him to veto this bill, right?

          No? While peasants get send to the front to die politicians are collecting wealth and power thanks to this war.

          You should expect politicians to do what’s in their personal greedy interest, being taking money from someone or stabbing them in the back.

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      So you’re fighting on the front lines in Ukraine? Why not advocate that the US go to war with Russia directly? You just want to prolong things out for a few months, and then a few more months… Aid package after aid package tied to Israel genocide and all kinds of concessions for Republicans, while pretending that it was always about trying to “help” Ukraine

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      He did the thing that liberals wanted him to do, so he’s a hero.

      When he does a thing liberals don’t like, he’ll be the enemy again.

      If you don’t like how a politician is perceived in western media, just wait a minute. Everyone from Ralph Nader to Strom Thurmond can be villainized or redeemed over a long enough timeline.

  • Oderus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This thread is great because pro-Russian morons are exposing themselves so it makes it real easy to block them.

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you care as much about Ukraine as you claim to why don’t you go to the front lines and fight for them… Better yet, why aren’t you advocating the United States to go directly to war with Russia? Wouldn’t it be cheaper to get rid of Putin once and for all and to make Russia pay for the war?

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Getting rid of Putin, and for that matter Xi, will likely not do a thing to stop the war on the Russian side, and the clear plans for invasion in the Chinese side.

        Hard evidence that neither country has functioning nukes would, but getting rid of either one just creates a power vaccume that will quickly be filled by someone that is likely to look much like their predecessor.

        • John Richard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          So what you’re saying is that there is no winning the war against Russia… Just sending more money to Ukraine indefinitely?

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, I’m saying we have entered a new Cold War against both China and Russia that is likely to last for the next several decades. We can’t win a war. There are no winners in war. All we can do is provide enough resistance now to prevent the cold war we are in from boiling into active shooting in other theaters.

            • John Richard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              The reason it hasn’t boiled into active war between countries is because we aren’t sending American troops to Ukraine to fight the war.

      • mashbooq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ukraine isn’t asking anyone to go to the front and fight for them. They’re asking for this aid. Anyone who cares about Ukraine as much as they claim will listen to what Ukraine asks for.

        • John Richard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Halp me. They are attacking me send money, not reinforcements.

          Geez, you have to be either blind or dumb to not see what this is. Proxy war is war. This is about money at this point, and what better way to funnel money than through aid packages.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Thank you for clarifying this I thought it was still bundles because all of the news was from the same day. I retract my previous comment.

  • Amoxtli@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The money isn’t going to turn the tide against Russia. Ukraine has no chance of winning. It is just math. Joe Biden has no interest for the well-being of Ukraine. US prefers that Ukraine bleed Russia. This means every last Ukrainian. Biden regime knows Ukraine can’t win, but that won’t stop him from lying about victory, and inflating the threat from Russia. Ukraine conflict is directly a product of US foreign policy and that alone. Even European states other than the UK don’t really support the war. At least, secretly. Publically, they have to.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly, what the fuck even is this bullshit?

      Ukraine is fighting an invading force that is kidnapping children and targeting infrastructure. They have no choice but to keep fighting. Without financial and military support, Ukraine will cease to be.

      You’re not wrong that America benefits from the proxy war that has weakened Putin militarily and politically. Putin, like Trump, is a punkass removed who is willing to kill to keep projecting power.

      If America stops supporting Ukraine, that’s not in anyone’s best interest except Putin.

      • Amoxtli@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        With or without financial aid, Ukraine will lose. It is math. Russians invaded Ukraine because the US was trying to isolate Russia from Ukraine. This means no tolerance for pro-Russian Ukrainian presidents; the coup of 2014 that overturned the democratic vote, and the subsequent declarations of independent republics in the Donbas because of the color revolution that undermined democracy. NATO afterward starting arming and training Ukrainians will promote NATO and EU membership. NATO is a US organization, and NATO foreign policy is US foreign policy. Europeans are subservient to the US for security. Most European states don’t support the war in Ukraine privately, but for the sake of NATO unity, they publically support it, because the US pays for NATO defense.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I mean, maybe you’re right about it being impossible for Ukrain to win. Putin is committed to hiding his fear with violence.

          The “coup” in 2014 was made much easier when Yanukovych murdered a bunch of unarmed protestors and then fled the country to hide under Putin’s skirt.

          NATO is a coalition of countries, which includes the USA. You’re kidding yourself if you think the EU doesn’t support Ukraine. Every EU country wants Ukrainian exports, and all of them are concerned with Russian aggression against foreign sovereign powers. The only EU country that doesn’t support defending Ukraine against invasion is Hungary, but we all know that the whiny shitbag Orban has been licking Putin’s balls in exchange for power.

          • Amoxtli@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            Not all countries in the EU support Ukraine. It is not in their interest to support the conflict in Ukraine. If Russia was such a looming threat, they would have paid their fair share in NATO military funding. Barack Obama pointed this out, not just Trump. Obviously, they preferred to get rich, instead of spend money on the military. Viktor Orbán is the sanest leader in the EU because he tells it like it is. A Russian threat is greatly inflated with myths of a new USSR. Russians are not ideologically communist, and they have no interest in controlling other European people. They have been there and done that. The Soviets had to deal with uprising and insubordinate leaders when they controlled Eastern Europe. Uprisings in Romania and Hungary. Ukraine is a security matter for Russia. There is no imperial motivation for it. It was well established long before this conflict that NATO expansion into Ukraine would be a disaster. Angela Merkel and Sarkozy said this much including Bill Burns as Secretary of State, and ambassador. Bill Burns still works in the US government.

        • ormr@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Wrong. EU countries have given over 50 billion $ support so far. Germany alone has given roughly 28 billion. There’s only a handful states that are in opposition against it, including lighthouses of democracy like Hungary…

          • rc_buggy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Look at the language. “Biden regime” “2014 coup”.

            It’s written in English, but it sure sounds Russian.

          • Amoxtli@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            2 months ago

            The money only accelerates their demise. It is not helpful for Ukraine. It is the opposite. If Biden really cared about the Ukrainian people, he would call up a cease fire. He wants no peace deal. He wants only war. NATO is counting on the Ukrainian nationalist to send every man to their death.

            • ormr@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Gtfo russian troll. Yeah, I look at the last three years and think: Biden… He only wants war!! Lmao

              • Amoxtli@thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                2 months ago

                Joe Biden signed a bill that funds the military or supports the military of Taiwan, Israel, and Ukraine. Yes, he loves war. Just because he uses others as pawns doesn’t make him eligible for Nobel Peace Prize. Joe Biden is a foreign asset, a war criminal, he is compromised and intimidated. He is subordinate to US agencies and foreign lobbies. It can be argued that Joe Biden is a traitor. Biden’s voting record speaks for itself.