• Baku@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    A couple of years ago I found a black and white photo from the late 1800s and wanted to figure out what station it was from. Google was useless and only showed unrelated stations, but surprisingly, Bing found a page with the exact photo on it. It was on one of those shitty scraper pages that just lists thousands and thousands of random photos, but nonetheless I figured out what station it was

    • lars@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Jesus Christ I guess I’m not misremembering.

      Bing’s reverse image search is essentially dead in 2024 unless you’re uploading the Mona Lisa. It’s really, really terrible and even worse than Google.

      My favorites right now are Tineye, Yandex, and Google, in that order.

  • beeng@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    It does seem like the ideology of those inside google went from “tech” , to “I know better than you do”. Not sure it’s fixable really…

    • ArtificialLink@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s the problem with most tech these days. They assume they know the best way to do something or know better than you. Its infuriating

      • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Spotify is a prime example of this. There are so many “features” I hate and that no one has asked for, yet shuffle doesn’t even work.

        Everytime I start spotify in ny office after listening on my commute, it tries to start playing on my phone since that was playing in my car.

        Or when I was still there, Reddit search. Absolutely useless and so fucking smarmy with that stupid doge.

          • businessfish@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            they may be referring to how spotify’s shuffle isn’t a true “shuffle” in that it is biased to things you have listened to more, recently, etc

  • Klear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Unrealistic. I usually have to scroll way down in the results to find a link to wikipedia nowadays.

    • Hellfire103@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t even care if the results are good. I’m not about to use any part of RUnet.

      • jeremyparker@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Honest question: why not? Facebook/Google/Microsoft are up to some disgusting shit, are their Russian counterparts significantly different?

        • Hellfire103@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Privacy, for one thing. I don’t use Google, Bing, Windows, or any Meta software*, and Yandex aren’t much different.

          Security, though, is another thing. I live in a NATO country, and I would imagine the Russian government are monitoring Yandex (and other RUnet services). Frankly, I think contributing any data to such a government would be against my interests.

          There’s also a lot of censorship on RUnet. Yeah, Google has that too, but Mojeek and Brave Search do not.

          TL;DR: Google is data-hungry and supplies data to the NSA; Yandex is data-hungry and supplies data to the Kremlin; Mojeek and Brave Search are good; DDG and Startpage are the best for the average user.

      • PP_GIRL_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Why noy? RuTracker is better than any other tracker, open or private.