The move embodies how ads are a growing and virtually inescapable part of the TV-viewing experience—even when you’re not watching anything.

As you might have expected, LG didn’t make a big, splashy announcement to consumers or LG TV owners about this new ad format. Instead, and ostensibly strategically, the September 5 announcement was made to advertisers. LG appears to know that screensaver ads aren’t a feature that excites users. Still, it and many other TV makers are happy to shove ads into the software of already-purchased devices.

LG TV owners may have already spotted the ads or learned about them via FlatpanelsHD, which today reported seeing a full-screen ad on the screensaver for LG’s latest flagship TV, the G4. “The ad appeared before the conventional screensaver kicks in," per the website, “and was localized to the region the TV was set to.”

LG has put these ads on by default, according to FlatpanelsHD, but you can disable them in the TVs’ settings. Still, the introduction of ads during a screensaver, shown during a pause in TV viewing that some TVs use as an opportunity to show art or personal photos that amplify the space, illustrates the high priority that ad dollars and tracking have among today’s TVs—even new top-of-the-line ones.

The addition of screensaver ads that users can disable may sound like a comparatively smaller disruption as far as TV operating system (OS) ads go. But the incorporation of new ad formats into TV OSes’ various nooks and crannies is a slippery slope. Some TV brands are even centered more on ads than selling hardware. Unfortunately, it’s up to OS operators and TV OEMs to decide where the line is, including for already-purchased TVs. User and advertiser interests don’t always align, making TV streaming platforms without third-party ads, such as Apple TV, increasingly scarce gems.

  • LunchMoneyThief
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The fabled HTPC is a fix that few people know exists for a problem that few people know they can do anything about.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Anything other than the native TV experience. I use a Nvidia shield personally.

      It’s not perfect but at least I don’t get ads for anything other than a few Disney shows in a small bar

  • Ænima@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Every day I turn on my LG TV, it wants an update. It’s been doing this for like 3 years now. Given the article, it won’t be getting that update any time soon!

    • SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I generally like the picture quality from my LG OLED but the interface is not great and you are sooo right about the updates. My SO constantly complains about turning on the tv and it needs an update.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The pop up is slightly delayed as well, and I think its very intentional so you turn it on and then start doing an action and select something, only to select the update.

  • elrik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    My TV is probably going to kick the bucket in a year or two at most. Filtering “non smart TVs” on a site like BestBuy shows only commercial display options at this point.

    Are there any well maintained projects out there that are able to replace the firmware on newer smart TVs to get rid of these features? I really just want a dumb display with an input for a Chromecast with CEC support (or similar device if Google decides to enshittify that platform with screensaver ads too).

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I think the best way forward would be a single board computer that can do an open source equivalent to chromecasting. Plug that in and leave your TV unconnected to the network.

      You can’t do chromecast directly, because Google holds encryption keys for it. Unfortunately, this means casting apps need to be modified to support it.

      There’s a few projects like this:

      • elrik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’m pretty happy with Chromecast currently for its simplicity. I meant to try and replace the TV firmware so it’s more or less a dumb TV that just displays its inputs without having ads and other gimmicks.

      • elrik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Probably the best idea I guess as long as you can set the TV up without Internet.

      • ResoluteCatnap@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Last tv i bought wouldn’t let you set it up without connecting to the internet. Guess we’ll need open hardware tvs next if they don’t aleady exist

        • Rubanski@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Couldn’t you theoretically set it up and afterwards unplug the wifi adapter? Edit: obviously the one inside the tv and not the router

          • ResoluteCatnap@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I just returned it, but my idea was a separate VLAN and block all connections except for whitelisted ones for streaming. Smart tvs/rokus/etc do a lot of talking and they could theoretically brick themselves if there isn’t an internet connection available.

            The future is a wonderful place!

      • Eiri@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        For now. I suspect some evil person will eventually think of baking in default ads for when it can’t connect to the network to get new ones.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If you want a Chromecast, why not just buy a TV that runs on Google TV (Android) instead?

      • elrik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The TV I currently have is Android OS but the built in Chromecast is noticeably lower quality. Not sure if it’s an older version or what.

        Regardless, IMO the displays themselves outlast their software support, and I prefer to just plug in whatever the latest device.

        I’ll also mention Android OS on my TV takes a full minute to “boot” and that itself makes me want to yeet it out the window.

  • Mercuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Okay, I have to wonder… what is the point of shoving ads down user’s throats all the time? Ads make me NOT want to purchase something. If I see ads for a product it just makes me hate that product. If a product pushes ads I hate that too.

    • ERPAdvocate@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      We are in the minority, its pushed so much because it works.

      There are some people who are outright influenced, but other times even shoving visuals at the user is enough to subliminally influence to a degree, advertising is all psychology.

      That’s why when I remember this when considering compromising and using something with ads. Its never worth the sacrifice, starting to apply the same philosophy to services who subsidize their cost of operating using data. Sure it costs me more but realistically that’s how it should be, there’s no free lunch.

      • Mercuri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, you make some good points. But I’m also wondering if it isn’t the advertising companies themselves who are perpetuating the idea that all this super aggressive advertising works to sell more advertising. After all, they tout targeted ads as some new must-have evolution but as far as I am aware targeted ads haven’t been shown to be any more effective than contextual ads. And maybe not everyone has the luxury to actively avoid purchasing products that annoy them with ads. But I definitely agree that it’s never worth the sacrifice.

    • LunchMoneyThief
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The primary goal is to simply get the information inside your mind. Whether you like or dislike it doesn’t really matter. That preexisting brand/product familiarity is often all that is needed to tip the scales months or years down the road, once you’ve “forgotten” all about the annoying ad, while you find yourself deciding between competing products on a shelf or on a store page.

      • Mercuri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I can see it working when you otherwise have NO brand recognition whatsoever, but seeing ads for, say, TikTok on YouTube every 30 seconds isn’t going to convince me to get a TikTok. I’m never going to be “gee I wonder what short form video content provider I should subscribe to” and even if that somehow miraculously DID happen, I’m going to research my decision and not just arbitrarily make a decision based on a notion I might have heard about a product one time months/years ago. Maybe if I didn’t have a computer in my pocket at all times where I could get unbiased reviews on demand that would work but definitely not in modern times. But apparently I’m in the minority.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh the irony. The site reporting LG’s ads wants people to remove ad blockers.

  • h54@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not only do I use pi-hole, my so called smart TV never connects to the Internet in my household. Hell, I don’t buy any smart devices period.

    • tomkatt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t use pi-hole currently, but have managed access via my router. My LG C1 has been locked down to LAN access only for a long time.

      It’s kinds great this way. Since it has an IP it doesn’t give me any bullshit about network, but no traffic escapes the home network.

  • Jin@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Disconnect your TV from internet. They are slow & limited, have ads and a lot of data harvesting.

    Get an Android device that faster and give you more control (not firestick etc.)

    • quixotic120@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      21 hours ago

      As if android tv isn’t also loaded to hell with ads and reliant on streaming networks that basically all have increasingly obtrusive ads

      Either only buy physical or pirate all of your media, set up a jellyfin server, set up a dns server that blocks ads (adguard, pihole) and point any device that can connect to the internet at it. Cancel all of your streaming subscriptions and use a coreelec box to watch your media from your jellyfin server. There are literally no other ways to not get obtrusive advertising.

      If you have an lg webos tv like me you can keep it connected to the internet but root it, block updates in homebrew channel, install YouTube with adblocking and sponsor block, and then again make sure it’s getting dns from your ad block server. Add in custom rules for

      us.ad.lgsmartad.com us.info.lgsmartad.com ngfts.lge.com lgad.cjpowercast.com edgesuite.net us.rdx2.lgtvsdp.com us.info.lgsmartad.com us.ibs.lgappstv.com us.lgtvsdp.com ad.lgappstv.com smartshare.lgtvsdp.com ibis.lgappstv.com us.ad.lgsmartad.com lgad.cjpowercast.com.edgesuite.net ngfts.lge.com yumenetworks.com smartclip.net smartclip.com

      snu.lge.com su.lge.com lgtvonline.lge.com

      These block ads and the last three block the update servers. The update blocking isn’t strictly necessary if you have rooted and blocked updates in homebrew channel but it will get rid of the annoying “new version” nag that pops up when you turn on the tv. You may have to clear caches on the tv

        • quixotic120@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          What kind of tv? For webos it’s potentially a bit complicated but also potentially stupid easy depending on which version of webos your tv has

          https://www.webosbrew.org/rooting/

          I would strongly suggest avoiding nvm even if it’s supported unless you’re very comfortable with hardware hacks. The others are all software and fairly easy to do if you’re capable with following instructions. The most recent, dejavuln, is fairly simple but can be a bit finicky (you may have to try a bunch of times) but lg is also rolling out patches for it so if your tv is updated you may be out of luck. It’s hard to say because the patches aren’t rolled out unilaterally. Webos is a bit confusing and there are many “branches” that all have similar features but wildly different numbering. If your tv is patched block updates by either disconnecting from the internet or blocking the above sites in your router and watch the webos homebrew discord (linked on that site). There are people actively researching new exploits and if one pops up it’ll be discussed in the discord first (and if it’s a big deal, like they expect it to be patched, they usually ping everyone to let them know to do it asap)

    • JDPoZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Bingo. Shield pro, and blacklist the MAC address of the TV and NEVER update the firmware.

    • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Unfortunately LG makes the best panels, and many other brands use LG panels(not as good as what LG puts in their own units).

      The solution here is to buy their ad subsidized tv and never connect it to the internet.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        There are some large computer monitors, depending on how big of a screen you want. There’s no smart crap in those, just DisplayPort and HDMI inputs.

          • reshuffle6655@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Depends on your definition of large; I’ve got an amazing 48" 4k 120hz OLED monitor that does no “smart” features.

            Alienware does a 55" that I think is the largest available rn though I can’t vouch for the inclusion or lack of ads or smart features.

              • reshuffle6655@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Totally fair, makes sense. Didn’t want to presume lol. I don’t have a space big enough for something that large but maybe one day haha. Hopefully by then they’ll be making gaming oled monitors that big. I have purchased some cheaper smart tvs for work that are 75 or 77 inches and man, the size is crazy. Those are cheap LEDs though iirc, cost less than my 55" oled tv.

              • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Yea I’ve got a 65" OLED with Dolby Vision. I’d have a hard time going back to anything else. But why even worry about smart features at all when an offline TV is effectively the same as a monitor anyway for less money and more entertainment specific features.

      • normalexit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Thank you daddy capitalism.

        I hope I can continue to make the smart TV dumb by never giving it network access. When that fails I’ll have to hope the pihole handles some of it. The other fun option might be to put it on a VPN in the EU and hope that it enables some gdpr options.

        Either way you’re right, it’s likely inevitable.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          EU vpn is cute but it is still feeding the parasite.

          Best TV is the TV that never touched the internet. It ruins their entire business model 🐸

          Peasants will never get ahead unless we start obstructing this bullshit.

          • normalexit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            My Samsung I bought last year required an Internet connection during setup, but after it updated it “allowed” me to disconnect it. Just to be extra safe I connected it to a guest network that I changed the password on so it couldn’t remember the credentials. The menus have ads (that never change), but I set the TV to default to the last HDMI port when it turns on.

            I wish they had an AOSP sort of approach to TV where I could install a new ROM and customize the TV OS with whatever changes I’d like, so I didn’t need extra devices to view Plex and my streaming channels. DRM shuts that dream down pretty quickly though.

            I hope that some privacy forward brands will emerge, but there just doesn’t seem to be consumer demand or awareness.

    • Noxy@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      To which remaining TV brands? They’re all gonna do this kinda stuff.

  • Ace@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    A year or two ago my LG B8 automatically bricked itself unless I agreed to the new terms and conditions. Literally something like “to continue using your tv please agree to the new terms”, and if I didn’t it was just bricked. They could have put anything in there and it was just “click agree or never use this device again”.

    It’s not been connected to the internet since.

    • gerbler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The fact that shrink-wrapped agreements aren’t automatically void worldwide is a fucking abomination. No you shouldn’t get to push a legally binding contract on me after I paid for the product. It’s my property now and if you want to require a license agreement after the sale then I should be able to decline it for a full refund fuck you.