• Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Everyone’s focused on whether Jesus can do it or not while completely forgetting regular people can do that

    Just, remove the water, c’mon.

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yes? He’s literally God and created the world. Doing other things as well like multiplying loaves and rising from the dead. I think He could make wine more and more concentrated, lol

    • supertonik@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’ve always found it amusing when people try to use logic to state that Jesus did this and this and it isn’t logical or God isn’t logical.

        • HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          34 minutes ago

          Well, not to get into a theological debate here but there are many logical inconsistencies and paradoxes with religion in general.

          Stuff like the “can God create a stone so large that he cannot lift it”; or just seeing all the suffering in the world and trying to justify why a benevolent, all seeing, all knowing, omnipotent being would allow kids to get cancer - either god is not capable to fix it or doesn’t care, neither of which is a great outcome.

          Just applying Occam’s Razor in general makes religion pretty far fetched, especially the more hardline old testament you go: God creating the earth, Noah and the flood, etc. There is just a much simpler explanation to all of it.

          I mean no offence to religious people in general, in fact I think religion can be very useful for some to find a purpose or belonging in their lives. I just find the cognitive dissonance of religion impossible to reconcile with reality.

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 minutes ago

            I think the Problem of Evil actually makes sense when you consider eternity and infinity. The infinity that God is and Eternity that Heaven is, earthly sufferings really will be seen to be nothing. You probably don’t worry about that exam anymore that you were studying for as a kid. As for the boulder thing, you may as well say maths is illogical as “can you make something greater than infinity” while infinity + 1 is equal to infinity.

            As for Occam’s razor- how does it explain the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ? There’s not really a simple explanation to why 2000 years ago, a lot of guys simultaneously told of the same dude who rose from the dead, then lived a life of suffering and no gain and end up dying because they wouldn’t claim to be wrong. Along with hundreds of these early Christians turning into thousands. Something big did happen - we count our years by it. It’s as if God actually did enter earth as a human.

    • Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      There was a British superhero TV show called Misfits. One of the delinquents had the power to control milk, I.e. you drink milk and this guy could curdle it in your body and kill you.

      Are we both thinking about 15% BAC murderin’ Jesus here?

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I interpreted this as “having the basic ability to take as actions would allow you to do this”, which is also true, I can ferment wine and then gradually make it more concentrated

      • Hexarei@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The easiest answer to this is yes, he could create a stone he couldn’t lift. And then he could lift it anyway.

      • dwindling7373@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Unironically the question by witch many Christian faiths differ: does God needs abide to the rules of logic or not?

        For the Roman Catholic, yes, for Calvinists and a bunch other (ok, many other but I’m not an expert), no.

        • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Answer: whatever causes the person you’re arguing with to throw their hands up and storm off more exasperated…

          • dwindling7373@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            No, not really, it’s mostly a matter of power.

            The Church itself is rooted in the idea that there are autorities on matter of faith and they adopted the Platonical Agostinean idea that faith is empowered by reason. Reason being a valid tool means you have experts that reasoned a lot about religion and people that know less and needs to be taught, ultimately by the Pope.

            The “other” side tends to reject authorities, and take the words of the bible as sobjected to personal interpretation or, to an extent, make it into some sort of magical object that the faithfull subjects itself to, without questions. Accepting the contradictions, the illogal parts, are what that kind of faith is about because to question (throught reasoning) God is a Sin.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Calvanists the ones that say since god is all powerful there can be no free will/everything is decided don’t apply logic?

          • dwindling7373@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            That’s the one, funnily enough in a perverted twist, they tend to see wealth as a sign that God has picked them as favourites (graced them) and they storically gravitated toward seeing poor people as, well, sinners, even thought their principles state that anyone could be graced or not no matter the more evident aspects of life.

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              This isn’t Calvinism. This is prosperity theology, which is it’s own thing.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    "And on the third day, there was a wedding in Cana. Jesus’ mother was there. When the wine was drunk, Jesus’ mother said to him, ‘We’re out of wine.’ ‘Bruh… That’s a big yikes. But why do I care?’, replied Jesus.

    Jesus mother instructed the servants, ‘you just do whatever he tells you no matter how stupid it sounds.’ Jesus sighed and turned to the servants saying, ’ Okay. You see those jars? Nope. Not that one. The big ones. Yeah. Those big ones over there. Go fill them up with water. All the way up. Then take some of the water and give it to the host."

    The servants were more than a little skeptical but shrugged and did as they were told. When the host of the wedding feast tasted the water, it had become wine. And the host exclaimed, “Damn! That is some good shit. Where did you get that from?” And the servants were amazed because they knew from where the wine came.

    And the servants implored Jesus, 'Do it again! No, wait. Can you make something stronger this time?"

    – The Gospel According to [Skibidi] John