• panchzila@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trees are a luxury, growing something like that takes time. I hope they really have a good reason for doing what they did.

    • torknorggren@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The reason is probably “raking is work.” I see this shit all the time in Florida, where we really need more shade trees.

    • AshDene@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And a public good. They keep things cooler when it’s really hot out, keep things warmer when it’s really cool out, mildly improve air quality, reduces noise pollution, provide measurable mental health benefits, and so on.

      Around here removing big trees is illegal, on your property or not. I’m a fan.

      Open soil instead of pavement also helps reduce flooding during heavy rainfall since the ground absorbs water instead of just making it run off to somewhere else.

    • socphoenix@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Considering they also took out the shrubs I’m betting not, though that tree closest to the house the roots may have been affecting the foundation I guess.

    • Striker@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Capitalism has drained their soul. They don’t think artistically. They don’t think about nature. They don’t see beauty. Their art is corporate art.

    • dismalnow@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like the car in the picture is important context. I’m thinking that the home was turned into a business, and the pavement is for parking

  • axtualdave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s like they heard lawns were bad for the environment, but stopped listening at the part about replacing it with native plants.

  • RandoMcGuvins@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just steal the image and put the source in the body text. That way you’re not redirecting everyone to reddit. Sort of defeats the purpose of the protests.

  • Gangreless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure they didn’t turn it into a shop? Those definitely look like they were made into display windows

  • dotfiles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would have left the trees alone, but removed the grass and covered it with small black and grey stones. That way the trees would still look nice, and the rain water can still pass through the rocks and prevent flooding, unlike this mess. This looks like a business now, it’s not a home anymore.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      pass through the rocks and prevent flooding

      Yah, that doesn’t work that way. Water needs to get pulled into plants or water channels created by dead plant root systems, or it just runs off. This is why deserts have flash floods.