• magic_smoke
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    You can sit here and have an argument about Nyquist-Shannon, but it isn’t relevant for lots of music made in the past 40 years since it was made or recorded digitally.

    If your work was made with a DAW there’s no point to analog.

    I’ve got a record from a smaller artist somewhere that I swear has fucking mp3 compression in it, because they don’t know how to export their shit like an adult.

    • ZephrC@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      The only meaningful difference between them is that digital is cheaper to copy. Your ears are analog though, so everything you’ve ever heard in your entire life is 100% pure analog, and I explicitly said in the post you seem to think that you’re disagreeing with that they’re both orders of magnitude better than they need to be.