The former president is now highly unlikely to stand trial in the Justice Department’s election interference case before November

The Supreme Court handed Donald Trump a massive victory on Wednesday by agreeing to rule on whether he is immune from prosecution for acts committed while he was president. The court will hear arguments on April 22 and won’t hand down a decision until June — which means it’s unlikely a trial in the Justice Department’s election interference case will commence before the election. If Trump wins the election, he’ll of course appoint an attorney general who will toss the case, regardless of how the Supreme Court rules this summer.

By Wednesday night, Trumpland was celebrating.

“Literally popping champagne right now,” a lawyer close to Donald Trump told Rolling Stone late on Wednesday.

  • Tyfud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Yes he can. Unfortunately. We all get to watch this birth of a dictator unfold in slow motion if Trump wins.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      How? Given the powers that the Special Monitor has, how could he possibly avoid paying?

      RNC certainly doesn’t seem like a likely option right now, and nobody else has ponied up the money.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I always figured the Jan 6 ones were a long shot, but these other two cases are done. He’s going to have to pay, and he can’t get an appeal unless he pays, thanks to NY law.

          That’s why it’s different from the federal ones.

          ETA: and he can’t just not pay, because the Special Monitor has a court-ordered obligation to ensure he pays his court debts. She’ll just seize his assets, which she has the power to do.

            • Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              It is different, because he’s not the one with the power over his finances. Having a court-appointed Special Monitor who oversees every financial transaction is not remotely the same as just expecting him to pay out of common decency (which he doesn’t have). Lack of evidence is not evidence of lack.

              If he becomes dictator, of course it won’t matter, but that’s a future possibility, not a current reality.