• noddy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 months ago

    Until meta starts to slowly block small instances and we end up with the next email. Technically federated, but controlled by a few large corporations that dictates the block lists. Let us block them first so we get to define what the fediverse should look like, not them.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Then we’re back to ActivityPub as it is now. I hardly see Mastodon people jumping to threads. And governments might prefer having their own instance.

      I’m sure the vast majority of people on Mastodon hate Meta enough to not jump ship. Why would you move from Mastodon to threads anyway? Instagram integration?

      • TwilightVulpine@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is what I don’t get about the anti-Meta paranoia. Their worst case scenario is… exactly the same as we have now. They can’t make every single instance hand them over their whole userbases, that’s not how federation works.

        I get why they don’t like Meta, but I have friends who use Facebook and Instagram, and maybe it would be nice if they could get a taste of the Fediverse experience. We might end up gaining more than Meta.

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I agree. The best thing we can do is take advantage of their federation by making a significant enough portion of their userbase on the fediverse, to the point that it relies on them. Many currently on the likes of Mastodon would probably rather die than use Threads.

          The only real benefit I can see threads having over the rest of the fediverse is Instagram integration, which the convenience of that might be enough to have people prefer it enough to give them a market