Due to an oversight, Trump’s attorneys failed to ask for a jury trial within the time allotted to them

  • krayj@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    So the repeated (ad nauseum) Trump claim “I only hire the best people” isn’t accurate?

    • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      If Trump could hire the best lawyers money could buy, he would.

      Problem is he is either stiffed his previous lawyers, so the smart ones don’t trust him.

      Or those lawyers are now witnesses in his legal battles. So they can’t represent him.

      • orbitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah when your lawyers have to record you (believe it’s something from Cohen’s testimony) to have a backup of what you requested, you don’t get the best lawyers. Trump would never hire someone that seems smarter them himself, he has to be the most intelligent person in the room (lol). No one intelligent would really act dumb enough to be hired by someone who is notorious for not paying, mean unless there’s other factors but he’s not getting a highly regarded and clean lawyer at this point.

        • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Anyone else have fun thinking about how fictional lawyers would represent Trump?

          Like I could see someone like Lionel Hutz representing Trump. Maybe Barry Zuckercorn.

          Not Bob Loblaw. I think Saul Goodman might pass on him. Kim Wexler I could see doing it probono.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s absolutely accurate, we just never asked by what metric “best” was being measured.

      “Best” in this case was apparently “someone dumb enough to think Trump won’t screw them out of money.” :P