• MysticDaedra@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    To be fair, the man is traveling constantly right now. I’d be exhausted if I were almost 80 and flying all the time.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      To be fair, if you’re 80 and the subject of like a dozen court cases, you probably shouldn’t be running for president. If he’s too tired to pay attention to his court case, maybe he should drop out of the presidential race? Clearly he’s too old and low energy to run for president.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I have a hard time believing that he would drop out. Not much in it for him, and I assume that if he loses, he’s gonna claim that the election was stolen again anyway to try and keep supporters interested.

        If he does, though, what’s the succession plan for a nominee? There has to be one, because people could get shot or have a heart attack or something. Do they just choose the second-place vote getter, Nikki Haley? There’s no time to run a new primary. Does the party internally pick a new nominee?

        googles

        https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/12/politics/presidential-candidate-race-drop-what-matters/index.html

        #What if a vacancy occurs after the primaries and before or during the convention?

        If the leading candidate was to drop out of the campaign after most primaries or even during the convention, individual delegates would likely decide the party’s nominee on the convention floor.

        That would shine a spotlight on the normally niche question of who those actual delegates are.

        There would be a messy political battle in every state over who would get to be a delegate (if the vacancy happened before many of those people were chosen) and then who they would ultimately support. Even people who did not run primary campaigns could ultimately be considered.

        You can assume, for instance, that Vice President Kamala Harris would be a top contender to be on the ballot if, for some reason, Biden left the race. At the same time, given Haley’s weakness in primaries, it seems unlikely that Republicans would coalesce around her if Trump was unable to run.

        On the Democratic side, there would also be another group to consider: the “superdelegates,” a group of about 700 senior party leaders and elected officials who are automatically delegates to the convention based on their position. Under normal party rules, they can’t vote on the first ballot if they could swing the nomination, but they’re free to vote on subsequent ballots.

        #What if a candidate left the race after the convention?

        It would take a drastic event for a candidate to leave the race in the few months between a party’s nominating convention in the summer and the general election in November.

        Democrats and Republicans have slightly different methods of dealing with this possibility. You can imagine the end result would probably be that the running mate stepped up to be on the general election ballot, but that is not necessarily guaranteed.

        Democrats – The Democratic National Committee is empowered to fill a vacancy on the national ticket after the convention under party rules, after the party chair consults with Democratic governors and congressional leadership.

        Republicans – If a vacancy occurs on the Republican side, the Republican National Committee can either reconvene the national convention or select a new candidate itself.

        #Would the running mate automatically become the nominee?

        An in-depth Congressional Research Service memo also notes that if an incumbent president becomes incapacitated after winning the party’s nomination, the 25th Amendment would elevate the vice president to the presidency, but party rules would determine who rises to become the party’s nominee.

        Neither party, according to CRS, requires that the presidential candidate’s running mate be elevated to the top of the ticket, but that would obviously be the most likely scenario.

        #Has a candidate ever left the race after the convention?

        In modern times, per CRS, the Democrat running for vice president in 1972, Sen. Thomas Eagleton, was forced to step aside after the convention after it was discovered that he was treated for mental illness (1972 was a very different time! Today, thankfully, there is not nearly the stigma attached to mental health).

        The DNC actually needed to convene a meeting to affirm Sargent Shriver as Democratic nominee George McGovern’s second-choice running mate.

        So probably his running mate if after the convention and probably someone else the party chooses if prior.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Fair. I wish people on Lemmy could take a genuine comment for what it is and not over-interpret is as political support, as I am sure you don’t support this person.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Why would anyone possibly think a person defending Trump supports him?! /s

        Yeah this person totally isn’t a rightwing nutjob, with gems like this in their comment history:

        There’s no correlation between the violent crime rate and firearms regulations in the US.

        • MysticDaedra@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Calling ~50% of the population “nutjobs” isn’t particularly conducive to productive political discourse. Solely using strawman and ad hominem fallacies just make you look like a partisan hack, not a serious person.

          It’s totally off-topic, but I stand by what I said in that other thread. If you can show me that there is a correlation that evidences decreased violent crime and increased firearms regulation, please let me know, I’m eager to read it. FTR, I get my crime stats directly from the FBI.

          I consider myself to be a classical liberal, someone who believes in the liberal values that allowed our great nation to be founded in the first place. To that end, I have no compunction calling out hypocrisy whenever I see it. Do I think Trump is a good person? Hell no. But between him and Biden, I believe that Trump makes the better president. The US and the entire World were objectively better off based on the stats under Trump than they are under Biden.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            It is absolutely a lie that 50% of the population supports trump or thinks guns have nothing to do with crime. I won’t waste my time with a bad actor like you other than to say in regards to your request for a source about crime: see any country that made guns illegal. I’m truly tired as can be when it comes to dealing with your type. That is why I’m on Lemmy. Maybe you should consider facebook?

  • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Sleepy is the product of much GOP work. Donny needs his own.

    Drowsy Don?

    Tired Trump?

    Comatose comb-over?

  • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Maybe a stupid question but how come in a nation of 330 million people, many of them should be qualified, the people are limited to two bad choices?

    Has it always been this bad in US presidential elections?

    • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s actually a lot more bad choices but you never know about them because nobody cares.

    • fosho@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      obviously he doesn’t as insisted repeatedly and frantically by dick bags like you.

    • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Neither “get a pass”. They’re geriatric deep-throaters for billionaires.

      Still gonna vote for Biden, but the boomer-banker oligarchy makes it a Coke versus Pepsi battle to an extreme degree nowadays. It’s all Cola, at the end of the day. With Biden, Israel is still gonna get their matzoh ball, hopefully Ukraine will get their borsch, as well. With Trump, no soup for Ukraine. But neither can do, nor want to do, or believe they should do anything that holds the powerful accountable.

      The local and state-level elections are where it actually matters to me, at age 40.

      Other than that, boomers gonna boom.