Brazil, Germany, Spain and South Africa sign motion for fairer tax system to deliver £250bn a year extra to fight poverty and climate crisis

The world’s 3,000 billionaires should pay a minimum 2% tax on their fast-growing wealth to raise £250bn a year for the global fight against poverty, inequality and global heating, ministers from four leading economies have suggested.

In a sign of growing international support for a levy on the super-rich, Brazil, Germany, South Africa and Spain say a 2% tax would reduce inequality and raise much-needed public funds after the economic shocks of the pandemic, the climate crisis and military conflicts in Europe and the Middle East.

They are calling for more countries to join their campaign, saying the annual sum raised would be enough to cover the estimated cost of damage caused by all of last year’s extreme weather events.

“It is time that the international community gets serious about tackling inequality and financing global public goods,” the ministers say in a Guardian comment piece.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Alternative proposal. Billionaires should pay an annual 75% tax on any income and any wealth in excess of 1 billion.

    • just_change_it@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That isn’t how it works though. Nobody is collecting billions in wages. They receive stock which isn’t counted as taxable income until sold.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          But 75 percent wealth tax can’t work, because that would require more liquidity to happen than exists. The attempt would utterly destroy most retirement funds in the process. Wealth tax sure, but need to be realistic about the scale of “money” actually possibly in play.

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’d probably deflate a bunch of overvalued stocks in the process of liquidation which would be healthy for the economy overall but, you’re correct, it would cause short term shocks to retirement and other managed funds.

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              No, long term there would be no economy. Wealth cannot be taxed. Humans tried that since ancient Roman times, never worked.

  • Disaster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Billionaires should pay 100% tax over $999,999.99 of personal wealth.

    Some people still get to be wealthy. Problem solved.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s weird to think I can be given stocks and have to pay real taxes for the value of those taxes. But somebody who starts a business and owns a large number of shares never has to pay taxes on those shares even though they got them when they were worth $0 and now are worth possibly billions.

    Often times those shares can be used as leverage for a loan providing the shareholder with the quality of life of a billionaire without ever paying the taxes on earning the billions.

    This feature of taxes ONLY benefits the super wealthy and everybody else just has to pay taxes for every dollar of wealth earned.

    • Syntha@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Often times those shares can be used as leverage for a loan providing the shareholder with the quality of life of a billionaire without ever paying the taxes on earning the billions.

      How are those loans repaid?