• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I honestly don’t get the hate against Biden. From what I’ve seen, he’s old and he’s done a whole lot of good, more than the average democratic president.

    Him being the choice over Trump should be an obvious, nearly anyone over Trump is the better choice, so what the hell is wrong with these people wanting to vote trump or not vote at all just to stick it to Biden?

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I honestly don’t get the hate against Biden.

      I hate on Biden, even though I believe he is a good president overall. My hate stems for the very obvious (maybe petty) reason:

      He is the wrong direction. The way to beat fascism is by being bold, progressive and forward thinking. Biden is basically the “let’s play it safe” candidate. All well and good, but clearly he did not reduce the appetite for fascism.

      And yes, I think Bernie would have.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I agree almost entirely. Boldness is the way to defeat fascism, and Biden is not bold enough.

        At the same time, I do think there is a caveat. Reducing the appetite for fascism is reliant on success, and, if I am being honest, fucking no one was going to be successful in this political climate with this Congress and electorate. If Bernie flounders, progressivism is discredited, even if it’s not at all his fault; even if he, individually, is doing the best anyone could be expected to do. If Biden, who is very much a moderate on most issues, flounders, appetite for change increases.

        There’s a sick calculus in politics that, though you as a voter should always vote for the best candidate who has a serious chance to win, in objective analysis, the best candidate winning isn’t always the best thing for the cause.

        I voted for Bernie in the 2016 and 2020 primaries, and if the 2024 primary was at all serious instead of locked-in to the incumbent, seriously speaking, I would vote for him in 2024 too, just to be clear.

    • Narauko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Prior to being the VP and now President, he had a long political career as an establishment corporate Democrat. His home state is where almost all US usury is headquartered, and he consistently sold out the American people to those corporations. He sponsored the bill removing bankruptcy options from student loans, sided with the banks and credit card companies on interest rates and fees, was a war hawk, and was more than “it was just how it was at the time” racist.

      Essentially every bit of the “whole lot of good” has been an 11th hour change of heart and fixing problems he was more than complicit in creating. Add to that the DNC manipulation to block other candidates, and you have the South Park special of a Douche vs. a Turd Sandwich.

      • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        You like “usury” don’t ya. The word. I noticed you used it a couple of times already.

        Usury. Has some weight to it, doesn’t it. Some heft. It’s got . . . connotations.

        • Narauko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Do you have a better word for lending money and charging exorbitant interest rates, fees, or conditions to unjustly enrich the lender? I could just call them legally gray loan sharks, which they are, but the laws surrounding the governance of money lending are actually called usury laws. That’s why I used the term. I think the Banks and Credit companies that have bled the countries bottom 50% dry and have nearly succeeded in eliminating the middle class qualify for the label, but you do you.