Sotomayor: If the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person and he orders the military to assasinate him, is that within his official acts to which he has immunity?

“That could well be an official act,” Trump lawyer John Sauer says

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The right question to ask is whether the president can decide to assassinate a supreme court justice. Then it becomes plenty clear to the supreme court fucks how obviously insane the rationale is.

  • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Biden should just send Seal Team 6 to whatever courthouse Trump’s hush money trial is at and tell them to sit on the steps. If anyone asks why they’re there, just saying “Waiting for the Supreme Court ruling”. Maybe park another team on the Supreme Court steps with a sign that says “Waiting for Clarence Thomas.”

    Biden would not be committing an illegal act. He’d be ordering the teams to sit on the steps and wait. Further orders would only come after the Supreme Court ruling, so Biden would be covered by the very same Presidential immunity that Trump just fought for.

    • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      He pretty much has to, or else Trump will imprison him an execute him in the next 12 months.

      I mean shit, if I knew there was a fifty percent chance my neighbor would kidnap and murder me in the next year… I’d be making contingency plans.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Unfortunately that’s not how Democrats work. For good or for bad they stick to morality (except when it comes to Israel for God knows what reason) and they’ll take the “high road” that just so happens to lead off a cliff, but it’s the high road so they need to take it even if it means their certain death.

        We’re a joke, doomed to die for the sake of the moral high ground that we have no right to even assume we have (see previous Isreal comment.)

        Edit: but also, from the article, this isn’t the actual desire. They already got what they wanted and that was a delay.

        • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I sort of agree, but at some point, Biden has to understand his own self, and his family, and all the colleagues he has worked with in his career are at risk. Trump is seriously escalating a dangerous game that only SCOTUS or Biden can put an end to. Politics is eventually violence, and Biden must know that.

          Trump is hiring expensive, smart people, to argue at the last peaceful authority in the country, that he will regain the power of judge jury and executioner. This is fucking chilling.

          • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            This should help left leaning voters reconsider gun restriction laws since most of them are enforced in blue areas, while red areas are all allowed to have essentially entire armories.

            If you live in New York or California, you can’t find a gun store within 100 miles of where you live that can only sell extremely restrictive features that would give the most battle hardened Navy Seal issues hitting targets, but in Idaho and Texas there’s a gun store on every fucking corner selling easy to shoot highly ergonomic firearms that allow morbidly obese boomers to effortlessly hit the dick off a fly at 1000 meters.

            • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Begging to differ, I’m sitting on my toilet in California and a quick Google shows there’s 3 gun stores within 5 miles of me. I’d have to pass the legitimate restrictions (which I easily could) and one of them looks very upscale and expensive, but physical access is not a problem at all.

              • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Fair point, but I’m sure you are only able to be sold a very specific set of authorized firearms, that when compared to what similar stores in other states happen to also sell; will reveal the differences are orders of magnitude.

                Case in point: a Cali compliant AR-15 is a horrible thing to shoot (I own this one).

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s just bizarre to listen to…

    Kagan: If a president sells nuclear secrets to a foreign adversary, is that immune?

    Sauer: If it’s structured as an official act, he would have to be impeached and convicted first.

    • Jaysyn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The very next question should have been “And if he has 1/2 of the House of Representatives killed at the same time?”

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        why only half? isn’t it more efficient to kill all members of all other branches along with all identified successors?

            • BaldProphet@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              While you’re at it, write an executive order dissolving Congress and establishing the President as a dictator. It’s an “official act” so it should be fine, right?

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Obviously, why wouldn’t he? This is potentially the dumbest argument ever heard in a court room and we’re all supposed to sit here and entertain its plausibility. What a joke.

      • Bipta@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If the Supreme Court were to greenlight this, it becomes the only logical choice in terms of preservation of the self and the state…

        My opponent will use this power for great evil, so I must use it first to circumvent that.

    • chakan2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Biden doesn’t have the balls for that…Trump, unfortunetely does (or he’s just too fucking stupid to realize the ramifications of it).