• CTDummy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    I though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?

    • nahuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Yeah, that’s what I mean.

      The person I was responding to was comparing it to cum hoc which means that the two events being considered simultaneously, which I don’t think is correct.