• within_epsilon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I must be a collaborator. Democrats campaigned in 2020 to shut down camps at the border, reasonably support the conclusion of the pandemic, fund infrastructure and restore state/union support. When did “stop the fascist” become a political platform? Why are Democrats not complicit in mass murder?

    • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Well, they did a lot of that.

      Biden got the railworkers the things they wanted in the strike without a strike.

      Biden has cleared billions of dollars for rail support.

      He was also the first president in the history of the United States to walk a picket line.

      As far as the camps are concerned, it would require congress to end them as the camps are powered by a law that was passed underneath GWB.

      Its not bidens fault some of you are unable to read.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        biden stopped the railworkers strikes forcibly and gave them bare minimum, still bad protections. my third world country can still do better so far.

        that strike had the potential to kick off the next workers rights movement and actually make you on par with the rest of the developed world.

        biden coopted a mass movement and stopped rich people from losing money, and workers from actually getting something done for the first time in decades. using violent police force and painting himself as a saviour. all that with a pathetic 30-second speech over the picket line. stay away next time.

        he can move billions of dollars all he wants but its meaningless when that money doesnt actually go to people, but sure im the one unable to read.

        • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Biden fired the guy who used to run the NLRB, and put in a bunch of actually pro-labor people, who gave lots of material support to all this union activity that coincidentally has been meeting with all sorts of success over the last couple of years.

          I’m not trying to downplay the hard work that unions have been putting in that have been getting them significant gains in the last few years. But Biden’s NLRB has been right there with them negotiating with the companies and giving them legal support which is absolutely crucial.

          my third world country can still do better so far.

          Wait – you’re not from the US, and deeply concerned with the US election and wanting to weigh in on who needs to win it?

          I know when I have some spare time, I like to go involve myself in British elections, or Japanese; I talk on message boards to people from those countries and have all sorts of things to tell them about how they should vote. It’s just something I like to do.

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            so he basically coopted the movement with his own appointed people, with bipartisan support. the actual result of it is zero paid time off for sick workers, one of their main concern when striking. they are still working grueling hours, and have to be on call for even more grueling hours. IIRC biden even outlawed further strikes under threat of violence (!!!). the one good thing he did was increase their bad salaries for… slightly less bad salaries, no free time and no further right to demand anything else?

            thats a lot of shifting money and people around so they can pretty much end the strike without caving to most of the worker’s demands, and keep the status quo. that is the main thing when leftists complain about elected “left” wing representatives being all talk while still keeping workers in a bad situation.

            the threat to the shareholders’ pockets alone was enough to get them on their feet and respond immediatly, this could have been the birth of another worker’s rights movement, but it was a big nothingburger instead.

            about the ad hominem, let me give you the tip of the iceberg: our conservative politicians literally went to the us recently, to basically ask your politicians for brutal sanctions on our country, the same people who tried to copycat trump’s jan 6 so yeah, i have all the reason to be concerned given your long history messing with our democracies in the region. thanks for the condescention though, but i bet a lot of you have many concerns about ukranian and russian politics now.

              • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I know many non-US people, especially from the global south, who take the attitude: Hey the US government is full of enemies to us, don’t try to tell me anything good about any one of them, please and thanks. For them to take that viewpoint honestly makes perfect sense to me.

                I know absolutely 0 of them who go on message boards and get real involved in talking with Americans about how they should view American politics and who they should support in American elections or who they shouldn’t, and how to view it, and what those people did in domestic US politics decisions and why that should impact who I support in the election.

                Just one of those little mysteries one encounters sometimes