• Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    How does this explain early societies and people that opted to work to improve their environment before money was invented?

    I disagree. We do just want to work. That’s what makes us human. We labor.

    • MJKee9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Working for our own benefit or for the benefit of those we love is a natural inclination. Working for others, often harder and at a detriment to our own personal joy, without a comparable benefit to us and our family is not natural.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Agreed. Thats why I never made the claim that people have a natural urge to get yelled at by a shitty manager in an exploitative fast food gig. No one is saying that here.

        The situation you describe is an illustration of alienation in the workplace, and this happens when workers lose the means of production. All of the comments in this thread tiptoe around this idea - for which there have been volumes of thought written btw.

        My issue with the meme is that it is ahistorical and can distract people away from the concept of alienation. The capitalist class pays us not because we are “naturally opposed to working” (which is the thesis of the meme), but because it is unbearable to work in an alienating environment, which, as you perfectly explained, abstracts us away from the products we create, compartmentalizes our work, and violently separated us from working for our families or communities.

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      People worked to have a calorie surplus so they could not work the next day, or they could make sure their shelter wasn’t leaking, or they could do something they found entertaining.

      People don’t work for the sake of work.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        So you’re saying people labor in order to entertain, love, create, do art, and do philosophy?

        Sounds very human to me.

        Never did i claim that people “work for the sake of work”. My argument is that humans can be characterized as working creatures who use labor to change their environment - be it geographically, politically, socially, etc…

    • Archelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you didn’t work you died of starvation.

      The majority of all people who ever lived were in subsistence agriculture, which needed constant labour to produce the food you needed to eat in order to keep yourself and your family alive. What improvements were made were developed to keep starvation at bay. If you gave a medieval peasant modern farming equipment, they’d be jazzed about how little time they’d have to spend plowing and milling and threshing and harvesting and how much more time they could spend getting piss drunk with their family and friends.

      A babylonian farmer didn’t “just want to work.” They wanted to live, and that meant they spent their life in back-breaking labour in the fields.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t see how you could see my original claim of

        “Humans are laboring creatures”

        Respond to it with

        “Humans need to labor in order to make food to survive”

        And still come from a place of disagreement.

        Never did I claim “people work just to work”. We don’t see people spending every waking hour outside making mud pies. We don’t see people spending entire days moving 100-ton blocks from one side of town to the other just for the hell of it.