FAQ

Q: why not organize and stop treating the bus as a legitimate entity? why aren’t you working to stop the bus?

A: do both. cut the fuel line. break windows. put oatmeal in the gas tank. but maybe your efforts don’t succeed this election cycle. and if so don’t fucking throw away your vote if it can help your neighbors fucking survive. “harm reduction” is not a political strategy for action. it is a last minute, end of the line decision to save lives, after all other resources have been exhausted.

  • Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    ITT: people calling for revolution who will never do a damn thing about it. It’s easy to pretend violence is the answer when you’ll never participate, let alone start something.

    • EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Way too many of these chucklefucks just want to LARP as pure and radical revolutionaries. My wife and I are disabled and live on a fixed income of her disability payments and the SNAP program. If this “revolution” they want so bad does come, then we’re among the most likely to just fucking starve in the disruption. I’m also one of the people the GOP declared they want to “Eradicate from Public Life” with Project 2025.

      Now, I’m not much of a Genocide Enjoyer. I think it’s one of the worst things you can do in fact. But I also don’t take too kindly to being effectively told that I specifically should just die because these wannabe revolutionaries refuse to entertain a world where we both vote for Biden to keep Trump from destroying democracy more than the GOP already has (harm reduction), AND engage in direct action to push Biden away from blindly supporting Israel.

  • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not voting is lazy in most circumstances for sure. What I hate is that people equate voting third party with not voting. I’m not voting blue. Y’all can’t guilt me into it. I’m voting for a third party socialist. 😏

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      i gently would encourage you to look into game theory and the far reaching implications of the spoiler effect under first past the post

      i do applaud your commitment to morally tenable candidates, however many folks find there is a deeper opportunity for good in the voting process, at least in the current environment, and i generally concur

      • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I appreciate you being nice. I understand the concern you have with the spoiler effect. But our country has been stuck in this lesser evil game for my whole life. That being said I also live in a very blue state. If my state were to go red it won’t be because of the few people like that vote third party.

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You have to change the voting system if you want to change the game. I suggest volunteering with Election Science to switch your elections to Approval Voting, so you can vote for everyone you like, instead of just the person you hate least.

          • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yep I know. Sadly elected officials are needed to change the voting system so that’s largely unhelpful.

            I’d love to have ranked choices voting. But like only the third party candidates would possibly do that. Candidates from team red or blue have nothing to gain by doing that and stand to lose everything by doing it.

            • Liz@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              They’re not needed in every jurisdiction. In some places you can change the voting method through referendum. It does suck when you can’t do that though. I still like approval voting over rcv, but anything is better than choose one.

  • LongMember69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    My favorite morons ITT:

    ”Both options are cliffs!”

    Yeah because the guy promising to end democracy and bring about Christian nationalism is exactly the same as the moderate we have now. I hope you’re getting paid to be that stupid.

    ”I won’t vote to support genocide!”

    At the end of the day someone becomes president, and spoiler alert the other option is still worse. It’s cute you think your principles are more important than the safety and security of at-risk groups domestically (and frankly abroad as well). Short-sighted and idiotic.

    ”We might not even get ice cream!”

    Okay well organize and protest that after we’ve avoided the cliff.

    ”Haha Americans are stupid for the entrenched political system that they find themselves in”

    Hope you enjoy your five minutes of smugness, because a Christian nationalist USA doesn’t benefit anyone in the world in the long run.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      a lot of the individuals ITT are here in good faith i believe. i’m more trying to get meaningful change to happen than sow discord by calling them morons.

  • Kumikommunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I will not be voting for anyone who supports a genocide. That will not change. Now there are two ways to change the outcome.

    1. If you are a genocide supporter who wants to be elected, you could stop supporting genocide, and be vocal about it.
    2. If you are someone who wants me to vote for your candidate, you could demand that they stop supporting genocide. Or demand that whatever party you like stops nominating people who support genocide.

    I will not budge. Will you?

    • Valthorn@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Two candidates that support genocide, but one is a christofascist. No matter who you vote for, genocide support wins. But you think it’s better to give the christofascist better odds than to inconvenience yourself with a vote you don’t 100% agree with, and possibly abstain from your chance to ever vote again. Not voting won’t fix the issue, since there’s no threshold on voter turnout for the election to count. The struggle against genocide must be fought in other ways. So unfortunately, this fall you’re getting genocide, so please make sure you don’t get fascism too.

      • Kumikommunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’d rather just not vote for genocide.

        Aside from the obvious, that will just be continuing to tell the two parties that nominating genocide supporters is good. You can continue telling your favorite party that you are okay with genocide, but I will not, thank you very much. This is why you are stuck between two genocide supporters. When your chosen party leaves you with a genocide supporter as your only choice, you tell them that’s good.

        And you are not going to fight the genocide in any other way, so don’t pretend. Your chosen party is one of the two that ratified bills to make any attempts at boycotts or sanctions illegal.

        Also, both candidates are fascists. Look at what’s happening on our Southern border, look at just our recent history in the Middle East, and look at the fascist government committing genocide that we are supporting.

        You don’t fight fascism in the ballot box. Every single example in history teaches you that.