As more and more states pass laws targeting “pornographic material” in books and online, they are repeatedly running up against a problem: The Bible has not just a few passages that could be considered indecent

  • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah… I agree. None of that makes selective enforcement the core of conservative laws.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’d argue it does, conservative lawmaking has consistently operated with a distinct understanding (and execution) that shows “this applies to them not us.” I’d love for conservative law makers to do what they say and say what they mean. However, they won’t and thus can’t build a coalition that gets them elected by being honest about their policy goals.

      Conservative law making in the US has become at its core “outrage politics” (and that depends on selectively enforcing ideals, policies, and laws/antagonizing part of the population). I don’t make generalizations lightly, but this is the core and fundamental piece holding the Republican party together, and it’s an awful state of affairs.

      This can be further demonstrated by Vivek Ramaswamy climbing in the polls despite, as Chris Christie put it, “sounding like ChatGPT.”

      • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m done with this conversation, you lot are ignorant, loud, and preventing actual progress and critical discourse.

        You want to talk about outrage politics? You morons are outrage politics. Fuck off.