• Tramort@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    29 days ago

    Of course the DOJ would be uninvolved.

    I’m talking about a personal suit by Biden: he’s the victim of the slander.

    It would be the best money Biden could spend. Nothing else is going to stop the reckless dishonesty by Trump supporters and attorneys.

      • Tramort@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        29 days ago

        For the one hour that it takes to provide testimony and cross examination? Yes.

        This is his lawyer’s time, not POTUS’ time

        • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          29 days ago

          1 hour of testimony in a simple divorce proceeding for a blue-collar worker is the result of dozens or hundreds of hours of working with the attorney on documentation and preparation. I imagine it would be an order of magnitude more work if it’s the POTUS suing for defamation. It also feeds into the “both sides” narrative to see Biden sitting in a courtroom, same as Trump. It doesn’t matter that Biden’s not the defendant, and it doesn’t matter that it’s a civil matter instead of a criminal one because the footage of Biden in a courtroom is more than enough to sell that story to the sycophants.

          • Tramort@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            In a divorce case you need testimony to understand what the other spouse did.

            In a slander case what evidence does Biden need to testify about?

            All the evidence is a matter of public record.