• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Only someone who knows nothing about external female anatomy thinks “nards” could possibly be a gender neutral term. But do tell me what plural parts of her genitalia that would show up in a typical naked baby photo would count as “nards.”

      Believe it or not, I don’t have a single photo of my daughter’s ovaries or fallopian tubes. They’re way too far up inside her for a camera to capture.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        They’re way too far up inside her for a camera to capture.

        Unless the cameras are designed for that. Usually found in hospitals and on plumbers. And the pictures that come out of those are not identifiable as who they’re from.

        I definitely agree with you that “nards” is in no way gender neutral as a term. I wonder how “gender neutral” @Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee would think it to refer to an infant boy as having a “hoo-haa”, “vag” or a “pus”?

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well that’s reassuring, it’s only her external genitalia you’re advocating tooth and nail for showing to her future partner.

        Glad we cleared that up.