• BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    The minimum wage was intended to be a living wage.

    The fact that you just tried to make a distinction between the two shows how far we’ve fallen.

    • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Minimum wage was never intended to be a living wage. In its inception in 1938 minimum wage was $0.25 an hour. Here are things that could be purchased for 25 cents in 1938. A gallon of milk, 8 postage stamps, a matenee movie ticket, 2 gallons of gas, … Rent was half a months wages. Minimum wage was never a living wage.

      • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Minimum wage was never intended to be a living wage.

        It absolutely was, and more.

        https://www.minimum-wage.org/articles/history

        As part of the FLSA, the minimum wage was enacted at $0.25/hr to maintain a “minimum standard of living necessary for health, efficiency and general well-being, without substantially curtailing employment”.

        FLSA also largely-restricted child labor and established an hourly work ceiling (overtime).

        Better luck next time, Jimbo.

        • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          If It was intended to be a living wage then why wasn’t it enough to be a living wage?

          I will refer to your own source.

          without substantially curtailing employment

          You have to look past the political propaganda and hyperbole. Minimum wage was implemented to get close to a “living wage” without hurting businesses.

          It shouldn’t surprise me that you blindly believe politicians.