• Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    33 minutes ago

    That’s great the prices aren’t going up more. Now go get all of these companies that are price gouging. It’s good to protect people from it during natural disasters but unfortunate the government didn’t consider COVID a natural disaster.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        2% is actually pretty good and about what you want. Maintaining flat spending power sounds great on paper, but also puts an economy at increased risk of recession and citizens at increased risk of ballooning debt.

        • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          We’re taking about the consumer price index here. Inflation regarding the cost of living only. This is, as i hinted previously, heavily caused not by “inflation” (as youd consider it in econ 101) but corporate price-gouging.

          Corporate price-gouging is i feel i must add capital N Not inflation in the traditional sense… But in the scope of this article and our conversation, it is.

          So again, fucking-A yes I want price gouging to stop, right now… So like, if you wish to continue wit me we need to agree on terms. Let me know you agree this cpi definition and inflation in this case is “price gouging” otherwise we may as well just part ways

        • basmati@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          That’s nice and all, but wages do not increase year over year for most people, so most people would prefer those risks and be able to continue living, instead of helping to balloon the suicide statistic.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Most people are not economists. Most people would like everyone to be given $100,000 and a pony (or just white people, if you’re a republican).

            2% inflation is good. But an inflation number doesn’t tell us where the gains are accruing. Ensuring gains go to workers and not capital is an entirely separate goal of the government.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Sure. But inflation is down, we didn’t go into a recession, and wage growth has been outpacing inflation for over a year now.

      This is good, we’re going in the right direction. Deflation would be way worse.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah but unfortunately that’s never going to change. Inflation is the rate of increase and they always want a rate of increase, just at 2%.

      It’s never going to go negative because growth for the growth gods!! :(

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Actually, it will never go negative (I hope) because if it goes negative we’re probably in for a massive global recession that will introduce untold suffering.

        You think they aim for 2% because that’s what’s good for rich people? 2% is the magic number for the whole economy.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Why are you asking Lemmy? Wage growth has been outpacing inflation. You should be getting on that train yourself if you want it.

        • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Then your union is negotiating it if they’re of any value. All the teachers unions around me negotiated 14-25% raises over 3 years over the last few years. If you’re a younger teacher you should look to job hop though. If you’re tenured you’re sorta stuck. In my area there’s three districts of the like 40~ I always push people that are new to end up in as once tenured in them you’ll earn well over 6 figures, even at the elementary level.

          Source: former education and still friends with my teacher colleagues.

          • NineMileTower@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            The union is currently negotiating. It’s a strong union. I’m in year 5. I’ve been looking around, but my position is highly sought after (PE Teacher) and the good positions go to people with much more experience. Also, I like where I’m at. It’s a low income area. The parents and admin let me do my thing.

            • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Low income is also better in uncertain budget times as Title 1 funds make sure they have both fed and state funds. Here in Cali our property taxes mean that the schools in poor areas are the most well funded and the schools in rich older areas are the least well funded. Just with variations on what “rich” means here too.

              If you have a state pension system too don’t forget to look into how that works for your district. There are some in my area that actually don’t pay the full percentage so teachers have a worse retirement than if they went to a different district with slightly less pay. So it’s all about the long game.