• otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    If it’s not slam, it’s roast.

    I think journalists like these words because they’re not provably false and therefore can’t get sued for misrepresenting what someone said

    • not a cop
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Do they get sued? Because there is a lot of misinformation out there, and I don’t mean in the far right “fake news” sense.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’d probably be slander to say “X said this” when they didn’t say it.

        “X expresses disgust about Y” could be slanderous if it’s not disgust, but “a respectful disagreement”, etc.

        But “X slams Y”? “Slam” doesn’t mean anything. So nobody can confirm or deny that any “slamming” happened.

    • goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      And if, heaven forbid, it’s not either of those, it is now apparently acceptable to refer to it as a “clap back.” In the newspaper of all places.