Identifying the pocket change transaction is really interesting.
One big talking point in monero, is fungible coins. No tainted coins. But it is interesting that this research firm has a tainted transaction, that they’re encouraging exchanges to look for.
Right? On one hand it’s awful the CCS fund was stolen and I hope they catch whoever did it. However, if they’re caught using huristics of their transactions then it’s a bow against the fungiablity of Monero.
Identifying the pocket change transaction is really interesting.
One big talking point in monero, is fungible coins. No tainted coins. But it is interesting that this research firm has a tainted transaction, that they’re encouraging exchanges to look for.
Right? On one hand it’s awful the CCS fund was stolen and I hope they catch whoever did it. However, if they’re caught using huristics of their transactions then it’s a bow against the fungiablity of Monero.
Luckily there are contributors out there still helping to iterate monero instead of forking to make a new version and claiming they are the creator.
Is that a dig at signals mobile coin?
Or ETC