• kevin@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, you send me html, my browser can interpret it any way that I want it to. If I want to ignore all of the image and script tags, I can. I don’t need Chrome or even Chromium. As Stallman says, you should know what is running on your system.

      • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We need to go back to html and css. Using an ad blocker and noscript literally breaks webpages. I just want to read the article! You know the content ppl actually come for

      • Smoogy@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But that’s also not private as has been claimed as a reason to go FF. The only reason to use FF is only to not use chrome. Not for all the reasons that chrome is bad.

        • zucky@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tor Browser, LibreWolf, and Arkenfox JS are the most secure and private browsers you can get and they’re all based on Firefox. If they’re not private enough for you, I don’t know what is

  • IntentionallyAnon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    DRM is stupid because it interferes with paying customers and isn’t effective. If there’s a will there’s a way

  • artaxthehappyhorse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah yes, 2023. The year I wore a pirate hat and touched more grass. Soon they’ll be bribing the govt to make going outside illegal.

    • They want to implement a “feature” so websites only load for you, if your browser, OS and hardware are deemed “trustworthy” aka you load every ad and malware that the website wants to shove down your throat.

  • Zinggi57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think a lot of people here don’t understand the danger of this fully and dismiss it with “Just use Firefox, problem solved”.
    Unfortunately, once this becomes widely available, that is once Chrome ships it, websites will start to use it.
    Maybe Amazon will just not sell to you anymore when you’re browsing with Firefox?
    Maybe YouTube wont serve any videos if you’re using Linux?
    Your bank will certainly implement this and only allow Windows 11 with Edge or some shit like that.
    Once this is implemented, we will all suffer, even if we’re using better alternatives right now.

    • Ember Ushi@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your bank will certainly implement this

      My brother in Christ, it was 2020 before my bank supported passwords longer than 8 characters. We have 30 or 40 years before we need to worry about the banks.

  • kool_newt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The rulers figured out the internet is too dangerous to their power. They thought they could control it and us, and they did for a long time, but it’s not working anymore. Now they are cracking down on our ability to communicate, to prevent ideas from spreading and taking hold that they cannot tolerate.

    • ImOnADiet🇵🇸 (He/Him)@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      ? They’re just following the end game of capitalism, they’re trying to squeeze every last bit of profit out of the internet that they can, it has nothing to do with the internet “threatening” power, they already took care of that with all of the spying laws they passed when the internet started getting popular

      • kool_newt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe, but capitalism has been the case the entire time, why is social media globally melting down in 2023?

        Also, spying laws are not necessarily effective at containing the spread of ideas.

        • ImOnADiet🇵🇸 (He/Him)@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          interest rate hikes, VCs are demanding their money back and companies are scrambling to become profitable/more profitable.

          Edit: forgot to address the other point, they don’t really care about us spreading ideas as long as we don’t actually threaten their power. There is absolutely 0 threat of a socialist revolution anywhere in the west right now