Apparently, I’ve been under a rock as today’s thread from Cory Doctrow - @pluralistic@mamot.fr is the first I had heard of this.

Where I live such entertainers are considered independent contractors (1099) and as such it is ILLEGAL for them to unionize. Is there something different in California that qualifies them as employees (W2)?

If not, how did they get around the capitalist governments’ rules?

  • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    Arent voice actors independant contractors and have a union, why would it stop other groups?

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think the idea is that its harder (hence limit) but not outright illegal, hence how voice actors do have a union, despite being independent contractors.

    • Throwaway@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      It wouldnt. The bigger issue is strippers generally dont do it for a long time, harder to form a union when theres high turnover.

      • CCLOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        While some entertainers do it for a short time, there are plenty that do it for 20+ years.

        • Throwaway@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          True, very true. Admittedly, I don’t go to strip clubs. Never felt the need when internet porn exists.

          But I do know that turnover is often encouraged to help keep unions from forming.