The teen girl was stabbed 28 times in a meticulously planned daytime attack.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    that’s the thing, the article says that at sentencing the judge “would decide whether to lift reporting restrictions so that the killers could be named.”

    That implies that people can be arrested, charged, tried, sentenced and imprisoned, potentially for their whole lives, under a veil of secrecy. That’s gross and scary.

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh, so they might not reveal it even if they are sentenced as adults to life. That’s a good point. And also true that the public could figure it out anyway from people who know the families involved.

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        that’s what the article seems to imply, and that’s the scary part, but I’m not a lawyer and I’m certainly not a british lawyer so idk if there’s some statute somewhere that says this all becomes public when they reach the age of majority or some other protection in place.

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m not sure how much of a difference it makes whether the public knows their names. It’s not like their parents aren’t going to know and can’t tell people or lawyers, and they’d be the only ones who could really do anything if it was a shady situation.