The use of depleted uranium munitions has been fiercely debated, with opponents like the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons saying there are dangerous health risks from ingesting or inhaling depleted uranium dust, including cancers and birth defects.

  • mashbooq@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why are you so worried about speculated harms when Ukrainians are actually being raped, tortured, and murdered by russians? Your lack of humanity is showing

      • severien@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        How about letting Ukrainians make that cost/benefit analysis for their own country? I think they’re grown-ups, no need to patronize.

        • mycorrhiza they/them@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          it’s not the Ukrainian people who decide, it’s the Ukrainian government that decides, and America basically decides what they decide

        • slice1@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are you really this delusional? Sure Ukraine has their own uranium munitions that they can decide to use anytime they want… When does the public get to decide on what happens with the tax money - fund schools, build infrastructure, etc. or send radioactive ammunition to fuel a proxy war in some corrupt country?

      • mashbooq@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Weighing costs and benefits happens with a comprehensive set of actual facts, not a hodgepodge of speculations and fearmongering that play into the fascists’ hands