Nearly every website today seems to be hosted behind Cloudflare which is really concerning for the future of privacy on the internet.

Cloudflare no doubt logs, stores, and correlates network telemetry that can be used for a wide array of deanonymization attacks. Not only that, but Cloudflare acts as a man-in-the-middle for all encrypted traffic which means that not even TLS will prevent Cloudflare from snooping on you. Their position across the internet also lends them the ability to conduct netflow and traffic correlation attacks.

Even my proposed solution to use archive.org as a proxy is not a valid solution since I found out today that archive.org is also hosted behind Cloudflare… edit: i was wrong

So what options do we even have? What privacy concerns did I miss, and are there any workaround solutions?

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        User experience?

        Wait, I thought we were talking about more than just user experience.

    • Strykker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sure 100% you can build a website without them.

      But anyone expecting to serve millions of users is going to use and need them or the user experience will suffer

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s my point. So it’s not fundamental. Just fundamental for big sites.

        And not anyone. Cloudfare and AWS are not the only cloud/CDN services in the world.

        But I understand now.

        • freedomPusher@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          The pattern is that big businesses can afford their own infosec experts and have no use for CF (who poses a disclosure risk to their business). It’s the small mom & pop shops that cling to CF. They hire someone cheap who doesn’t have a high infosec proficiency, who just takes the cheap lazy path of deploying the site on CF. They usually don’t even bother to tweak CF’s extra privacy-hostile default settings.

    • freedomPusher@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      You say “fundamental” when I think (from context) you mean to say “essential”. But to be clear, Cloudflare is not essential to business or the internet. Consider banking in the US. Big banks are competent enough to not need CF. But credit unions are small and on shoestring budgets. So CUs are increasingly exposing all their customers to Cloudflare to save money. If you are a client of a CU that starts using Cloudflare, I suggest switching to paper statements and quit using the website. Switch to a CU that does not expose you to Cloudflare. So far that’s not difficult but that could change.