• Handles@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    So Hollywood copyright lawyers will target illegal subscription services rather than individual downloaders? Fine by me.

    I can understand paying for a legal streaming service where at least a tiny percentage of profits goes into producing new material. I pirate out of convenience and availability, because movies and series aren’t released immediately in my region.

    Paying somebody for streaming film and TV shows that they have no hand in producing, and thus not supporting new productions — same as I can download for free myself? — that makes no sense to me.

    • jagoan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Paying somebody for streaming film and TV shows that they have no hand in producing, and thus not supporting new productions — same as I can download for free myself? — that makes no sense to me

      It makes sense for me. The one i’m using is $20 per year. I just think of it as convenience fee. It has netflix features but for all movies and tv shows.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I understand why people do it, but for me it’s a principle thing. I’m not going to pay someone for content they stole. Fuck that.

        I generally don’t have a problem with copyright infringement, but people who make a profit from it are scumbags.

      • Handles@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        And like I said, I get convenience/availability. I guess paying for stolen goods is one step too far for me. Like, “Dude, pass it around, but it’s not yours to sell”.