• Bazzatron@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess you have to pick your poison.

        Personally I can’t think of a single traditional value worth preserving and I’ve got nothing worth conserving - given the pollution of the right that modern day corruption has completed, I’ll stick to the lesser, at least until I can’t dodge advertising anymore.

        • bankimu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you’re going by the English meaning of “conservative”. The word is badly chosen, because I don’t think they really are traditionalists. Probably “capitalist” would be a better fit. And paradoxically there are many things I find the “progressives” want to do which are in fact regressive. It’s a bit confusing and I think names should be changed to something else if it were up to me. Words have power, and words like “progressive” and “woke” have positive connotations while “conservative” has negative connotation which is sad; they don’t even apply anymore to the groups or ideas they represent.

    • Ren_Rosemary@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you don’t like it, then fork the and start your own curated version of Odysee. That’s the beauty of federated software.

      And while yes in its current state the userbase is pretty toxic; that’s the price to pay when you have a platform with total free speech. The early adopters are always going to be the ones who rely on it the most (unsavory individuals). However this is no argument against free speech in the same way that criminals being the first ones to adopt privacy related projects, is no argument against privacy.