Guess she’d like to see all her “unencrypted” chats published for the world to see…

Look into your municipality’s recycling process, see how it’s done, what the inputs are, what the total energy use is, etc, etc.

I’d bet a year’s salary it’s far less effective (if at all) than most people think.

“Recycle” was/is a marketing grift developed by the oil industry in the 70’s. It largely isn’t effective.

As someone else mentioned, aluminum (and steel) are very recyclable, and are already extensively recycled in manufacturing (don’t forget that reusing scrap within a factory is considered recycling).

Everything else largely isn’t, yet. Glass is very recyclable, but the transport costs are exorbitant, so I suspect it’s a negative for things like drink bottles, while the energy costs on most plastic recycling makes it not yet viable, from what I’ve read.

Someday, just not today.

If the 3 R’s, Reduce is the one that truly makes a difference.

There were handheld electronic card game players in the 80’s.

You’d be surprised how many phone calls took place at that time.

Mayne talking about a show, or chatting someone up, etc. You were bored, so a phone was great.

Readers Digest contained multiple books in one volume

Run it in a VM, then get the NoCD from gamecopyworld?

(Not sure if that’s an option for securom)

You “will try” tomorrow.

Take the word “should” out of your vocabulary for the most part, especially with self-talk. It’s often not useful.

Your the elf that wanted to be a dentist!

Ah, yea, that seems more like something that wasn’t intended for breaks.

Definitely disruptive.

Oxygen has an interesting plot, similar, but not it.

I think the prison angle in this film wasn’t the main premise. Just how a technology was used.

There was an eye drop that delivered a drug or something that could…do something to your brain.

Uggh, wish I could remember more.

Similar style, but that was a mini-series (for lack of a better description).

This was a movie (IIRC), and she was held in a prison in her mind (so she thought), I can’t remember the details. Futuristic, but not very far into the future.

I guess all the philosophers who’ve written about it over the centuries got it wrong then?

There was another movie around this idea very recently, maybe a couple years ago. Can’t remember the name though.

Young woman in isolation, think she helped create the system, maybe was on Netflix like 4 years ago?

I don’t mind those breaks… It feels like going to the next chapter in a book.

But actual ads, yea, not for a service that costs.

Though this whole thing is funny - they collect even more user data than they did with cable or broadcast, and now want to show you ads too.

Can’t wait to finish my media server setup.

Lol, have my upvote for a great backstory!

Also, I think the word you want is “apprised”, which means “to inform”, while “appraised” means “to evaluate”.

Lots of homonyms in English, another pair is “weary/wary”. Weary means fatigued, wary means cautious.

Killer album, really shows their musical chops. I’ve listened to it so many times.

It’s reminiscent of Medeski, Martin and Wood.

Bingo!

Now consider a large business with dozens or hundreds of network devices.

Uggh, the chsllenges.

New infra will likely have IP6 enabled, and they’ll slowly switch.

It’s great for backbone and public address space - and maybe in enterprise, but there it’s a costly transition that won’t happen immediately. Things will change as hardware ages out and is replaced.

New infrastructure will be mostly IP6.

And when people leave the office, their machines will connect to, and transit IP4 networks, so they’ll still need to address how everything works over IP4 (say VPN connections, any hardware/software that’s still IP4 dependent in the data centers, etc).

Thank you.

I’ve said this repeatedly in many communities and it’s like I killed the golden goose - people lose their minds.

I disable IP6 everywhere - my router NATs everything as it is, why have another protocol running if I don’t use it?

We’ll see what the future brings.

Thanks for the thoughtful reply.

I’ve heard many times that revolvers or semi-auto have less recoil than the other, hence the question about slide mass/energy, as the only element I could see being different which could possibly explain why people hold this opinion.

Do you know of any actual metrics/tests done that show this clearly? Or is it just a perception issue?

(And yea, we’d have to agree on a definition of what we’re measuring/comparing). Do any gun magazines run proper tests occasionally to make comparisons?

I admit my physics classes were a long time ago, but at first glance it seems felt recoil would only be marginally different between a revolver and a pistol using the same round. If anything, I’d expect the revolver to have a greater felt recoil, given the mechanics of a pistol… But I could very well be wrong.