Said a simpler way:

1/3= 0.333…

1/3 + 1/3 = 0.666… = 0.333… + 0.333…

1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 1 = 0.333… + 0.333… + 0.333…

The quirk you mention about infinite decimals not incrementing properly can be seen by adding whole number fractions together.

Like I tell everyone I sleep with, I got 9 inches for you, just be ready to take it in 3 doses ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ

Ain’t even gotta do that, just imagine he suffered for 500,000 years and he did, just like everyone and everything you ever knew was created last Thursday

actually they’re only slightly off. 3-400m/s

Though that’s for individuals. The average is near 0, since they’re all going in random directions, canceling each other out.

There’s more to transactions than the purchase of goods and services.

Donating money is a transaction. Using counterfeit money to donate while claiming it is legal tender makea the donation fraudulent.

Crawl back under your bridge, mate.

Actually it is inherently illegal. It’s fraud.

Because like the previous person said, they’re attempting to pass it off as legal tender by getting the homeless person the money so they’ll use it.

Yes. Desalination or hydrogen separation via electrolysis

Both uses are productive, one generates fresh water, the other can be a form of energy storage.

Both are extremely energy intensive for the yield, making them unprofitable, but are extremely useful things to do with a glut of electricity.

The ambiguity doesn’t lie in they, it lies in the way the writer constructed that sentence, as the person you responded to already stated.

The writer (and the person they are communicating with) knows the plurality of the “who”, an outside observer (us, the readers) aren’t privy to that information. Clarification on the part of the writer would provide that context. But the sentence isn’t written to be read to a 3rd party, but the other party (the person the writer is communicating with).

99.99% of people understand this intuitively, but this is the way you’d parse the understanding of that sentence.

And if you’ll note, in my second sentence, “they” is understood to be singular—the writer.

E: and for Shits n’ giggles: if neither party (the writer nor the person being communicated to) knows the plurality of the “who” they are referring to, then it’s irrelevant information. They will discover who wrote it when they go searching.

And if you’ll note, in that previous sentence, it’s understood that I am using the plural they (the writer and the person being communicated to) in both uses of the last sentence.

Probably fear of cutting yourself with that single blade.

That’s what took me so long.

BTW, anyone here who face shaves regularly, switch to a safety razor. This is a threat.

Singular “They” is literally almost as old as the word “They” itself.

People have gotten by using it for almost 700 years.

The pose. The presence. The POWER.

I can’t. I need it in 7.62 NATO

You know what? Fuck it, 6 more years of 2020.

OP, you’ll love this

Sorry for the reddit link

3 older sisters, 1 younger sister.

Haven’t spoken to the oldest in over 5 years. No hate, she’s just 10 years older than me, has 5 or 6 kids, and lived halfway across the US for my entire life.

2nd oldest and I talk at least monthy. We’re the closest. Twin and I talk once every couple of months.

Little sister and I haven’t spoken in months, and even then we rarely talk to each other and she has never been the first one to initiate contact. We fought a lot growing up, relationship got a little better after moving out, and now I have no idea what her issue is.

Today’s her birthday, I have no intention of reaching out. She’s engaged, I have no interest in attending the wedding. She went no contact first, I just have given up trying to reach out and maintain a relationship she clearly doesn’t want.

You’ve said to much. A team has been dispatched to your location.

The NAACP has eyes and ears everywhere. Do not resist.

Or do, make my day.

All political feeds to go back to being boring

Notice me senpai :'(