• 0 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 7th, 2023

help-circle





  • A zoom in into the complexities of some scientific (or, sometimes, other debates) revealed oftens that both sides has had their arguments, their reasons. In the historical treatement of this or in the cause of school stuff, it appears that one side has a self evident truth and the other side simply doesn’t get it.

    For instance, the The Great Debate aka Shapley-Curtis-Debatte. Everyone at least vaguely familiar with astononmy knows that the universe is much greater than one galaxy. But back then, there were mixed evidence. And the reasons one side won is often complicated, and involved some theoretical assumption you could doubt. Who knows about the theories about standard lights and all that stuff? It’s not that difference from today.

    The power of science, in my opinion, is the acceptance of doubt. You are not forced to believe but think about ways to test.







  • Yeah, I wouldn’t be too confident in Facebook’s implementation, and I certainly don’t believe that their interests are aligned with their users’.

    I’m quite sure, they arn’t. This statement doesn’t mean that I think they have bad intention or something. It’s just, at least for me, obivious that the interest of the users and these of the companies are highly different. This is also the case with other companies and their customers.

    Having access to the data means that they will be required by law to provide that data to governments in various circumstances.

    A more paranoid person than myself would suspect that any big enough gouverment world simply force the companies to collect and share data.

    The metadata problem is common to a lot of platforms.

    From the viewpoint of the cooperations, this is a good deal. Enough privacy to keep people on the plattform and still enough data for advertisment.