It’s also legal in British Columbia, Canada and it has been since 2000

This article is from 2017

How’d you get this working?

Do you think a CEO would want to hire a firm that MISSES facts? Facts that would make said CEO vulnerable to a costly lawsuit?

If the law firm bungled the investigation, it would affect their reputation and future business. Wouldn’t that mean they have a monetary incentive not to favor LMG in their investigation?

I just read the last part of the Harvard statement included in the CBS article:

We will consider conferral of degrees promptly if, following the completion of all FAS processes, a student becomes eligible to receive a degree.

It sounds like they’re not getting degrees. Am I missing something here?

Are you seriously claiming that we’re done with equality in the workplace

Can you make a point without a straw man? I said nothing of the sort.

And I don’t disagree with your point about daycare; I think people need options, but I disagree with your point about online relationships being dopamine-equivalent to “real” relationships, personally. I’d LOVE to have a family but I have neither the space nor the money to have kids.

Personally I think communal child raising should be more normalized; I think children experiencing many different and at times contradictory viewpoints is good for their development of critical thinking. But I don’t presume to fully know the solution to lose birth rates. I DO however claim that whatever financial incentives are being given, they aren’t enough.

And realistically today, advocating for a stay at home parent is telling women to go back to the kitchen. It’s regressive, unnecessary, and not actionable advice.

No, what YOU said is regressive. The commenter never mentioned women; men can just as easily be house spouses, and that’s also without mentioning non-binary partners. You just assumed they meant women and ran with it

Edit: grammar