![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/a64z2tlDDD.png)
Really? Because there’s only one issue in the repo…
Really? Because there’s only one issue in the repo…
I didn’t say anyone was obligated to agree with me.
I didn’t say my outlook was correct. I don’t think objective morality exists so I wouldn’t say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple.
I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous?
Again, I don’t have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it’s obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me.
I have never apologized for rapists.
Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions?
Have you considered that multiple people can disagree with you? I don’t have any alts LOL. Proving my point.
Was this generated by some sort of schizo sjw AI or something? You are increasingly incoherent.
I’m afraid of all rape victims? Lol you’re really good at this jumping to conclusions thing. I’m happy to watch you tire yourself out though.
I smell projection. Your comments are basically non sequiturs. I’m also not sure you understand how to use Tylenol.
So let’s just be clear here. You’re saying that everyone who opposes the death penalty is terrible? How did you come up with that? What reason would you have for killing a rapist? How is there a positive outcome from that?
Yes only terrible people want to avoid killing people
A lot of green box people say they’re against the death penalty until they get mad at someone. I’m actually against it though so I agree with the tweet.
Edit: Not sure if the downvotes are coming from all the red box people ruining this platform who are pro death penalty or the green box people who think I’m against them.
Wow that’s horrible. They’re using c++.
Well the problem with the Texas power grid is that it exists in the first place. Still, when it comes to safety, you have to multiply how bad it is by the number of people it will affect, and divide by the amount of power generated to get the right picture. There is a media bias towards rare, intense events which causes people to think they are more common than they really are. This explains people’s views on nuclear power, school shootings, terrorism, shark attacks etc.
Statistically nuclear is by far the safest form of power generation. Of course, it would be good to locate it in areas that are not disaster prone. As far as I understand it though, the issue with nuclear is the cost. But in a perfect world we would need something to smooth out the inconsistency of renewables, either battery tech or something like nuclear that you can turn on and off as needed.
Strong typing doesn’t have a widely agreed upon definition. Duck typing is not equivalent to dynamic typing.
Get the nuggies meal you amateur