![](https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/ed88f7ec-febc-45ce-8dbb-298a232d2955.jpeg)
Is anybody able to contact Pedro Pascal ?
Mastodon https://kolektiva.social/@SteveKLord
Pixelfed https://anar.chi.st/SteveKLord
Letterboxd https://letterboxd.com/steveklord/
Matrix https://matrix.to/#/@steveklord:matrix.org XMPP steveklord@yax.im
Is anybody able to contact Pedro Pascal ?
That’s understandable. Would that even be possible, though?
Thanks for this. I love Peertube but definitely find search to be something that holds it back from being more widely adopted.
Excellent movie and currently free to view on Kanopy which you only a library card to sign up for.
“attracting” companies like Intel that are on the BDS boycott list is not really a good look for Linux.
Prior to Oct 7, Gaza had one of if not the highest densities of rooftop solar panels in the world. The IOF has obviously reduced that through their bombing campaign. Hamas and being “woke” have nothing to do with this.
That’s scarily accurate and funny like the Onion. Isn’t that what the machines did in the Matrix? Maybe this is how it all starts
That’s a pretty accurate summary from my understanding as well, especially in times when the power is cut such as the current siege.
That’s a good point. I generally copy the title verbatim from the article but as you’ve pointed out it’s a bit misleading. This is definitely not magic.
I’ve heard a lot about Palestinians using solar to power several electronic devices in Gaza but it was primarily from Arab media sources like Al Jazeera. While this was on the much more corporate and mainstream news it was easy to miss without actively looking for it. You bring up a good point and I wonder if there’s more use of solar energy happening there, especially in dire conditions, that we’re missing out on as it’s not typically covered by major news sources. Hopefully we’ll be reading more stories like this in the future.
It says the technology is similar but doesn’t get into any specific comparison so I don’t exactly read it the same way. This is a very brief and basic article that may not answer all your questions. I’m sure there is more to come.
It does go on to say:
According to the study, the device is more efficient than other existing atmospheric water generators because it uses a “novel rotating operational strategy, in which one module works in the desorption, while the others work in the adsorption simultaneously … to keep the device harvesting water continuously.”
The technology could also be used for purposes ranging from dehumidification to agriculture irrigation to thermal management for electronic devices.
It also mentions similar devices being used in areas such as Sand Branch Texas outside of Dallas. Your question is import and and while I can’t answer it as thoroughly as I’d like I imagine these issues were in consideration when working on this and whether or not they’ll be successful is something we’ll find out soon.
Would be interested in hearing more from the community.
Haha. Maybe not the inventors but, given the high price of this technology, it seems like someone along the supply chain did.
Thank you. And those are only the confirmed dead. There are thousands more missing and presumably dead under the rubble.
You’re grasping at straws to try to invalidate me instead of saying anything that would back up your point making your argument weaker. There was no repetition from me so if you’ve heard this before it would seem you’ve had this discussion before and may benefit from listening. Perhaps you shouldn’t respond if you have nothing to say
A better example of a pogrom might be the killing of over 30,000 civilian Palestinians and simultaneously starving them to death with blockade following 75 years of occupation and a century of colonialism. Proportionality matters and it doesn’t favor your argument
One need not pretend something that is already factually accurate. This was a retaliation and direct response for Israel bombing Iran’s consulate in Syria on April 1. This is why Iran targeted and struck the Negev air force base ( which contains US F-35s used to bomb Gaza ) as that is the base from which that attack originated. This is also why Iran says it now considers the matter “concluded” and warned the US and Israel against further reprisals. Those are facts and not “pretending” so if you are going to “pretend” this isn’t true and try to distort the matter I’m not interested.
The best part is the UN charter clearly states that when a country is attacked, it has aright to self defense. Let’s watch Israel talk their way around that as they vindicate Iran and incriminate themselves.
This is a great summary which helps to demystify the term. Thanks for sharing