Ridiculous and wholly unnecessary government overreach. Every official that touched this should be fired and publicly dragged through the mud.

Nah, that’s a violation of the First.

Fair to middlin’

“On the right side of the dirt.”

You can win it, the reward is a slightly different cutscene but the ultimate outcome doesn’t change. It does give a little more insight into Genichiro though.

Precisely correct.

Ours was a woman, an older prostitute and meth head everyone called “Teddy Bear.” You’d see her walking everywhere in town.

“Oh no, that’s so sad.” - Biden

"Finish the job. " - Trump

Pretty sure Palestine is cooked.

What’s MAS?

A good guy with a gun, iirc.

The Colonies.

This is more believable, I think.

Humans require an external threat to unify against. An alien invasion could provide that. Without some great enemy to oppose, I do not think we would come together willingly.

Why? Who’s holding a gun to the head of these drivers and forcing them to work for this gig? The onus isn’t on the customers, it’s on the drivers.

This is so hilariously backward. Customers are getting what they want, and so is the company. It’s the drivers with the problem. Why would a customer stop using the service?

What’s flawed about it? If you don’t like the deal, don’t be a dasher. No one is forced to deliver food for money. No one is being fooled about how little it pays. Y’all act like it’s some big secret that the gig isn’t great, but that’s common knowledge. If no one wanted the gig and all its drawbacks, then they wouldn’t sign up for it.

No one is holding a gun to your head to be a dasher. If you don’t like it, do something else. This is entitled af.

“If you don’t like how we do it, go make your own” is the biggest cop out.

Ideas have to have heads to live in.

Compelling, except there’s no implicit control over what the “luck” brings. I assume it’s always positive, but from who’s/ what’s perspective? Winning the lotto might be lucky, but it could be some other “positive” thing that you don’t really care for. Maybe that’s a little too “monkey’s paw”? I dunno. Just to many variables.

I think I misinterpreted your post, I thought you were implying the lawyer was an awful person. I wholeheartedly agree that he did a bad job.