Energy drinks are counter intuitive.

The first thing to understand is there is no such thing as a “sugar rush” in the sense of gaining a burst of energy. The crash though, is very real.

Your body has not evolved to process that much sugar, so it tries to store it, which itself is energy intensive, so consuming large amounts of sugar will make you lethargic.

If you need the burst of energy in the morning, drink black coffee. You’ll learn to love it as your palette develops.

In addition to this, Valve is also becoming involved in restructuring the Wayland Protocols, called Frog Protocols.

What is the significance of the Frog?

Surely these things are related somehow?

But what about muh prophecy?

Dude stop embarrassing me in front of the Wizards.

Oh no…

He’s replying in the comments too…

This is sad…

Get a load of this guy, peeling their apples, grapes and tomatoes.

I do the same with rats

Just thinking about how kinky it is that they’re subservient to us. We tell them “no, you slutty little time zone, it’s cold now, so we’re gonna move the small hand back, and if you’re good, we’ll let you come an hour earlier in six months”

real people

Ew

I only consciously fantasise about people who don’t exist.

Sometimes they aren’t even people, they could be abstract concepts, like a time format, or a plan.

Sometimes I even fantasise about concepts of a plan.

First of all, it was an orangutan, which is not a monkey.

Second, it wasn’t a prostitute, as the orangutan wasn’t paid.

Third, I had no idea, as the orangutan was shaved, and they turned the lights off before I got into the bed.

They’re also burnt out just getting to and from work/home.

Some sleep at their office to avoid commuting. While others will rent wall-coffins.

It’s regrettable that it became part of “psychology 101” (in a general sense).

Can you imagine how much misinformation is piggybacking off these “facts” about human nature?

New meta: be as specific as possible so that others think you’re being ironic.

I mean, I’m happy with where it ended TBH

I think that makes you amnesic

Gnostic / Agnostic is simply a claim about knowledge.

I’m agnostic as to whether my bread is stale. (I don’t know if my bread is stale).

I’m gnostic about the planets shape (I know it’s a dodecahedron).

Theist / Atheist is a claim about belief.

Every person fits into one of the following:

• A Gnostic Theist claims to know God exists (therefore implicitly believing)

• A Gnostic Atheist claims to know God doesn’t exist.

• An Agnostic Theist believes in God but doesn’t have sufficient evidence to make definitive claims.

• An Agnostic Atheist doesn’t have sufficient evidence to make claims about God, and therefore doesn’t believe.

In terms of rationale, both Gnostic groups make definitive claims without sufficient evidence and should not be trusted.

The Gnostic Theists believe in something without evidence, this is a fallacy, but it’s something we all do every day. For example, I don’t know if it will rain, but I believe it might, so I bring an umbrella.

An Agnostic Atheist is the most rational. If you don’t have sufficient evidence to make a definitive claim, then why would you believe it?

Moral of the story: don’t skip the tutorial.

deleted by creator

I don’t know man, sounds like something you should be asking Todd at the next shareholder meeting.