Even if he were prosecuted, his lawyers could claim he was too senile to know what he was doing, and it’s not like he’s got enough years left in him to worry about seeing the end of it.
Even if he were prosecuted, his lawyers could claim he was too senile to know what he was doing, and it’s not like he’s got enough years left in him to worry about seeing the end of it.
Those are things that are in the interest of the US foreign policy agenda.
Can someone remind me of the last time a U.S. president took a principled stand on some foreign policy issue? Seriously, I’m not just asking this to be a dick. I’m pretty sure things are set up to ensure this does not ever happen.
It’s like they spent a lot of time and effort thinking about, how many different ways can we make this more terrifying? I’m having trouble coming up with anything else they could do short of anything really blatant like attaching it to a mobile body with flailing meat grinder arms and giving it a blood curdling 100 decibel scream.
Yeah but this kind of salt they only taste test every half million years or so, so the expiration dates cant be trusted to be that precise.
They were carried by knights who didn’t have horses.
Maybe, but if true it means that whether the child is choking on feathers or bowling balls, they are ejected at the same speed, which is a great advantage of this technique.
Automated package testing before each update rolls out to users.
In the event that an update does break your system, you can roll back to the last snapshot from the grub menu (using the smart btrfs setup that is the installation default).
Also generally, maintained by very smart people, community is not toxic, corporate overlords more benign than most, IMO.
Or while bending over and sticking your butt out.
That’s how that language construct works. That’s pretty much the point of it.
I thought of that but, no, that tree includes languages that didn’t exist then.
What is “year 0”?
Couldn’t you save a lot of money by scanning a few dozen at the same time?
“Leery”? I don’t think that word means what the writer this it means.
i love when scientists take a swamp of arbitrary language terms and decide to impose some arbitrary specific meanings on them for purposes of their specific discipline and then convince people who don’t really get how language works (i.e. most people) that the definitions are authoritative. it’s fun to watch the cognitive dissonance when this collides with actual usage and people get all angry and righteous.
How does one write an article like this without ever once giving any detail about the nature of any of the image manipulations? Those could range from pretty innocuous to blatantly desceptive. The entire significance of what they are writing about depends on this.
so that suggests you may need to add calcium carbonate to your water first.
What makes it harden? Is it nonnewtonian? Does it impale its prey?
I picked long ago. I just finally found a potential upside.