I said in my final paragraph that Lemmy is nice but there is so little content here. The communities I frequent here (with very active reddit counterparts) have like a submission every few days. Just check !football@lemmy.world for example.

Who cares, we’re leaving an economy where no one cared about profitability. Just growth. It’s all about whether they can capitalize on that growth now.

Spotify was the same. Turned a profit the first quarter after shifting the focus towards profitability.

I’ve never seen the view of an IPO so heavily affected by bias. Superusers hate Reddit but so what - what matters is whether soccer moms are scrolling and being shown ads. No one cares that the most costly users are unsatisfied. You and me both are nothing to investors.

Is there some objective analysis of this IPO? All I’m seeing is “I’m a superuser who spent a lot of time on Reddit in 2007 and it was far superior back then. The stock will tank.”

Is it just money? Or why would Lavia and Caicedo choose the football dumpster fire project that is Chelsea over Liverpool?

High price for unproven talent feels like the theme of the football world right now

Keeping Kane essentially means postponing the problem one year and in a year. It must make more sense to go through the problem now with £100m to spend on building a new squad rather than waiting a year and then start the rebuild without the 100m?

It’s the wise thing to do. Feels like it’s more a personal decision than a logical one to keep him.

Yeah, when all the videos, images, and audio leaked in the Greenwood case, we should’ve all just said “You know, we just can’t know for sure”

According to reliable journalists, Ten Hag pulled the plug on the deal DDG had accepted.

Quite a dick move from the club. He was supposedly offered a new contract at even lower wages which he declined.

Is it possible that a specific age group will experience long-term effects from the pandemic? I’m referring to individuals who were young enough during the pandemic for their training to be disrupted but old enough for it to impact their progress.

For example, while a few months of missed training might not have a significant impact on 5-year-olds, what about those aged 11-12, specifically those born in 2010? Could we observe a slight underrepresentation in that age group due to the pandemic’s effects?

Ironically, people who have managed to do this would not see your question