![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
[They] only have immunity for official acts
“Only”. This is exactly why they issued such a nebulous decision, so people like you will say, “Look! It’s not actually unlimited!” The only act they give any specific answer for is the president’s right to prosecute anyone they want without justification, which they say is a-ok. Everything else they sent back to the district courts, not to “shove it up his ass”, but because they are the “court of final review and not first view”. In other words, they’ll deem it all “official acts” later, when (they hope) Trump is in office and this pony show won’t matter anymore.
You’re right, but also, at the moment their effort to do that hinges on an absolute moron.
Again, I already addressed the violence approach. Does nobody read the full comment?
You say that like it’s a defined thing that will keep a president in check. SCOTUS rules on constitutionality. Are you really that confident that they’ll keep Trump in line if he gets another term and starts really getting to work? The road to fascism isn’t paved with goods intentions, it’s paved with mealy mouthed, two faced decisions like this that give more and more leeway until it’s too late to take back.
I already commented on Biden’s willingness to enact violence on his political rivals.
Biden definitely needs to make a move here, but I don’t see that working. There’s a difference between “the POTUS is immune from criminal liability”, and “the POTUS has the power to alter the government as they choose”, at least, there is for a President that isn’t going to enforce their changes with violence, which Biden hasn’t shown any sign of being.
Perhaps there’s a way to swing this new legal freedom in a way that does something like that, I’m not smart enough to figure that out. I do at least know that, if this isn’t addressed A fucking SAP, then the US is in some serious trouble.
Just say ACAB, dude. Trying to put it into some code only obfuscates the very message you’re trying to convey and makes you look like a white nationalist to boot.
Seymour is a good dog. Rudy’s a human shaped sack of shit.
…yes. That’s the joke.
Did you just step out of a time machine? Their sales haven’t had games for ages now. Last one was the monster game, iirc.*
*Oh, there was the Saliens in 2018, too, but that was like a one-off.
Did a non-teacher, government official scold you directly? No? Ok, not the same thing then.
New humans cost money, and might not obey their corporate overlords.
It’s less of a “dice jail” and more so a “dice oubliette”.
Ooooh weeeeee
Calling out usernames is so damn annoying. At best it’s a distraction from the content, particularly if it’s a serious story like this one. At worst it encourages other idiots to come up with the most obnoxious name they can so they can garner attention.
It’s a study by a US organization. Why would it have access to information about Canadian territory? Also…what does an open border have to do with anything? Do you expect either country to be able to block those sorts of things?