Is that Shin Hati?

This is glorious and worth the shit post.

SCOTUS Just needs to blanket overrule any ruling out of the circuit that stays the whole country.

I’ll start. They took my queen and didn’t pay dowry.

And the OG for those funnier than I am

The confluence of legal sports betting and ads on Amazon streaming is destroying my psyche

"It’s not me, it’s you. Like why your EL keeps dropping. "

enPassAnt1234$&! is my password for all accounts. Except when it’s chEckmAteAtheistsnoReallyCheckMatelikeinchess69!?$

Fair points. Conformable coats are common in space applications.

I have never seen them in my short time working on space electronics.

I for one welcome our new alien butt lords

Yes the Biden years have not been some sort of economic triumph, but if you take the question at face value, how were things four years ago? They were horrible. Unemployment was record highs. Stocks had tanked. Hundreds of thousands of people were about to die. Etc etc etc.

That’s the problem with the binary decision, about the role of president, who doesn’t even make a lot of the critical economic decisions anyways.

The economy is not “good” but many indicators have been improving or are better than expected. But mishandling an event like a pandemic will certainly tank the economy, just like neoliberal policies will generally lead to a good stock market and little else.

It’s the same reason Republicans are asking “are you better off than you were four years ago?”

Anyone with an existing ideology probably knows who they are voting for. Swing voters are emotional.

Republicans are whistling to those just willing to judge the economy based on a Democrat being in office.

Biden is trying to thread the needle by pointing out there have been positive indicators without shirting on his own policies or advocating straight up anti capitalist messages.

After the primaries, the race is always a race to the middle.

Not sure the angle here.

Yes potentially there was “mutual rape” or whatever you want to call it.

The point of the poster is that a) rape charges against men are often prosecuted, b) going to parties to find “easy women” who are to drink to legally consent, even if you are also at the same level of drunkeness, isn’t a great idea.

If the poster is sexist, it’s mostly just trying to market to its audience and the legal realities.

This is a poster trying to get 18 year olds to moderate and consider their behavior, not be a treatise on law or gender studies.

This statement is great in a vacuum. But a lower court put up an injunction to prevent the white house from taking to any tech companies. Lol what?

We don’t want any social media company becoming a mouthpiece of the the state (under any administration) but pretty much all media is in communication with government officials and yes to a degree those government officials can somewhat influence what those businesses CHOOSE to say and do.

We didnt have to live in the world where SCOTUS had to spell that out

That’s why I might say about Wendy’s, but not the grocery store.

The government has to get involved right? For something like food, you can’t set up a system that walks right up against price gouging.

I think if you have time to scope them out and their lifestyle

What’s your point? I know the guy in question is said to have suggested someone would try to kill him and make it appear as a suicide. Why would Boeing or Airbus for that matter be aware of those statements?

Sure accidents are great but if you just decide to off someone quickly it’s not like you can shadow them for weeks and wait for them to climb onto their roof or something. Dude was at a hotel all week 🤷

OK but this is why people give a shit when a CEO is cagey about how their magic box works