![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
This shit belongs in your diary dude.
This shit belongs in your diary dude.
You don’t agree with most aspects of reality.
With only the context of Tyson’s video, I felt it was douchey.
Any honest, relevant response to Terrence Howard would be interpreted by someone as douchey.
It’s definitely not.
If you’re sincere, you’re an idiot. So I hope you’re lying.
Remind me why it’s legal for a foreign government to fund election campaigns in the U.S. against it’s critics?
Because in this case there are people that will call you antisemitic for even noticing that it’s happening.
Why? We get to tell the truth and apparently deeply bother you all at once. Seems like a win-win for everyone but you , and you don’t matter.
Im assuming the spider is your landlord.
Talking about it hypothetically is a cop out.
It’s clear from the paper that Terence has no idea what the process of a peer review is, so maybe start by educating him on that.
By assuming he doesn’t know what peer review is (something anyone can google) you have guaranteed that someone will find your response douchey. By not giving a peer review you have also been dismissive.
Isn’t the Smartmatic lawsuit still in play? That one has the potential to be even bigger.
Cool. Give us one for Terry here.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Life has a carbon impact. Forcing this burden disproportionately on athletes while spectators (not to mention corrupt IOC officials) enjoy hotels with AC is ridiculous.
I don’t think they can. Once a centipede is of decent size I think it’s much stronger than the average house Spider. Australia notwithstanding.
The emissions from ACs for 2 weeks likely isn’t close to the emissions from all the construction they did just to host . The whole thing is ridiculous. The corrupt IOC officials watching from box seats and staying in 5 star hotels are all going to have AC.
Sure. Just not while remaining honest and on topic.
He should have treated it like an amateur that needs encouragement not a colleague that needs the hard truth.
There is no way of saying “your fundamental method of understanding the world is faulty” in a way that someone won’t describe as “douchey”.
You’re “know what you’re talking about” score is 2/10.