Absolutely, and it’s by design by candid admission of environmentalist organizations and green parties. Their objective was over regulating the industry beyond any rationality and they succeeded.
Absolutely, and it’s by design by candid admission of environmentalist organizations and green parties. Their objective was over regulating the industry beyond any rationality and they succeeded.
Lemy has such a hard on against nuclear. I’m seeing reports by antinuclear think tank grifters shoved in my face almost daily…
Yes, this is literally what happens. If you’re too stupid to see that it’s not my problem lol
Keep telling that to yourself until they kill the nex…oh nvm it already happened 🤡
Lol nice scouring job 😂 now go ahead and tell me with a straight face it’s the same frequency and severity with pitbulls
I’m sure plenty of golden retrievers don’t have responsible owners, yet I don’t really hear of children mauled by them on the regular.
This BULLSHIT comes up every so often, and I’m kinda tired so I’ll to someone else to try and explain how the electricity grid actually works.
Yeah totally the customer’s fault for wanting a nice display in friggin 2024, certainly not the software’s which still has no proper support for it.
Because solar panel efficiency is already pretty low so it’s best to put them in the areas and in the orientation in which they will receive the most light
Exactly. An idiot like this should never be enrolled in a technical university.
This forum is exactly like its reddit counterpart: hot garbage
Citing a comment I’ve recently seen, it’s amazing how humanity managed to produce only one generation actually competent with computers.
Sure LMAO
I don’t think you understand the concept of exponential, or radioactivity for that matter tbh. The statement is completely truthful.
The harm of ionizing radiation is given by the activity of the source. Which decays exponentially. You should not go on the internet lecturing people you don’t know about things you don’t understand.
Also, you moved the goalpost: first you claimed waste “doesn’t decay exponentially” and then without acknowledging it, you now claim that “exponential decay is not the same as losing harm exponentially”
Sorry what? That link literally explains the exponential decay of radioisotopes.
Rate of decay for a specific isotope is constant, so its abundance decays exponentially. Of course a species can transmute in a new radionuclide so the process in total will not be exactly exponential, but pretty close. Seen on a log scale it’s awfully close to a straight line
Funny how everyone is immediately concerned with a few thousands of cubic meters of solid waste that literally loses its harm exponentially quickly and we can store underground while all the billions of tons of toxic liquid and gaseous waste coming from a sleuth of industrial applications (including renewables production) constantly being pumped in the biosphere never get a mention
Well you know how that goes.
I don’t, please elaborate.
Woa bro I was saying hard on but this is a full on raging erection maybe you should deal with your frustrations