God forbid you have to interact with a table to get information.
Should we make it a listicle for you while we’re at it?
God forbid you have to interact with a table to get information.
Should we make it a listicle for you while we’re at it?
You’re the one getting flustered and demanding everyone else use the words that make you comfortable, rather than the words they prefer.
What do you think “special treatment” means exactly?
The problem is people using clear language to describe something, and you preferring different language? Is that a correct assessment of your anger?
Selling your location to the GIGN, believe it or not
Who’s playing dumb?
You knew what the speaker meant and challenged their use of language.
I’m asking what’s unclear about the term “people with a penis” and you’re getting riled up.
Are you ok?
It seems like your entire gripe here is “those aren’t the words I would use and I’m not ok with that”
What’s not plain English about “people with a penis”? It seems excessively clear and to the point.
Is the word “people” too difficult for you?
“Passive language” is a specific thing that doesn’t apply to what you’re talking about.
I think the words you’re looking for are “propagandized language” or “pacified language”
Ah yeah see you knew what they meant. What’s the issue?
Good thing you’re here to sus out the BS, otherwise we might all have been hoodwinked by OP recalling this friendly conversation at a store.
Honestly at this point you’ve spent longer trying to explain why it’s made up than OP took to write it.
Are you happy with the person that you are? I can’t imagine you’re very pleasant to spend time with.
I’m not your mother, you’re welcome to be as hypocritical as you like dude.
You could try avoiding them altogether then.
I’ll take that as a yes
So you’re just a mass-market email fanboy?
🤣
You’ve never done something and thought “oh hell this isn’t want I signed up for”?
misuse and abuse
🤣
Do you, by chance, run a business that sends out mass email spam?
You said it wasn’t a big deal because it wasn’t an international incident.
Honestly what the fuck are you trying to say?
It’s an international incident because it requires international intervention to solve.
If you look up the definitions of “international” and “incident” in any dictionary it should be pretty straight-forward to understand why anyone would use that term to describe the situation at hand. But somehow you’ve decided it’s not that - but you can’t say why specifically, nor can you define what qualifies as an international incident.
But he owes you an explanation?
Ok 🤣
So if that’s not what you’re arguing for, where is the line when something becomes an international incident?
It seems to me like you aren’t sure or at least aren’t capable enough to communicate your position clearly, but you have a visceral need to keep arguing because your heels are so dug in already.
You’re arguing for states having free reign to fuck with international entities by doing whatever they want - up to, but not including, the Cuban missile crisis?
He didn’t say for sure he’d come.