still less bulky than one ANPVS-4
still less bulky than one ANPVS-4
Compliance person here. Background checks are run by a third party who we contract to gather information from authoritative sources like state agencies, governments and credit reference agencies.
No serious company would purchase profile data from a data broker.
i open the I Ching
note that in the UK, yes they can. The offence is “failing to unlock the device.”
refinery malfunctions truck/ship breakdowns
sounds like “how to get prescribed as a terrorist organisation 101”
a pretty grafana dashboard? peak web traffic looks a lot nicer than i thought!
my dream porsche right here in one pic
geo engineering is a stopgap solution. it enables the continuation of fossil fuel burning, and rampant over consumption. it does nothing to prevent ecosystem collapse in our oceans, decline of breathable air or extinction of native species.
when you hear “geo engineering”, think of “clean coal” and “sustainable aviation fuel,” because they are one and the same
I’d be happy if that happened.
I’d like it to go that way too but realistically, no government in the world is going to go after a massive hedge fund or investment bank for failing to stop a company asset stripping a public utility for profit.
yes that would be awesome, but the problem is that “make it publicly owned” means “buy out their shares” which is giving them a bailout, plus “service all the debt the company is in” which is another bailout, before you’ve even got started with fixing the horrible lack of investment over many years
so the shareholders pull their funds, the water companies struggle and the taxpayer has to step in to bail them out.
problem is then that shareholders will pull their money and invest elsewhere leaving the taxpayer to pick up the pieces. clever privatisations always leave the public purse to bail out any losses 😒
the solution: don’t privatise in the first place. it’s like selling all your shit at a pawn shop
would love to but where does the money come from to buy out all the shareholders? you would need to raise tens of billions - remember we just spent £10bn to give people a 1% tax cut
and before you say “fuck the shareholders,” remember that lots of them are your pension fund
i thought he was doing a poo
yes but then the US doesn’t expect to sell huge quantities of its cars in China and upset the market. Nor would China permit that.
Except it’s not capitalism when China does it, it’s socialism. The EV manufacturers like BYD have had massive subsidies from the state to bring those products to market, and that level of state support and intervention is not palatable to Americans.
Political, Climate change and National Security concerns aside, the subsidies are how the US government are about to justify the tariffs.
it’s pro hoc, not cum hoc. which is to not say that it is not objectively, very funny.
place one solar panel on your roof, connect it to your mains input, all possibilities of reliable energy use disaggregation go out the window.
this. here’s proof https://x.com/PeoplesMomentum/status/1194221297603088386?ref_src=twsrc