• AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    3 months ago

    Will this apply to advertisers, too? They don’t block outright scams, so probably not. Money absolves all sins.

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        My point was that ads are a big part of the typical user’s experience, and it is hypocritical to believe AI needs to be disclosed but not apply that to paid content.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      tbf, a lot of ads are already misleading as it is, so pointing out AI isnt going to change its perception much.

    • Uvine_Umbra@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Harder, but in this with mutliple generations of people being trained to question every link and image on screen? Not necessarily impossible.

      People will report this for sure if they feel confident.

      There will definitely be false flags though

    • Sabata11792@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m waiting for the constant big drama when it turns out Big Popular Youtuber of the Week gets accused of using/not using Ai and it turns out the oppsite is true.

  • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s good, but soon every video will partially be AI because it’ll be build in into the tools. Just like every photo out there is retouched with Lightroom/Photoshop.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    None of this is AI-specific. Youtube wants you to label your videos if you use “altered or synthetic content” that could mislead people about real people or events. 99% of what Corridor Crew puts out would probably need to be labeled, for example, and they mostly use traditional digital effects.

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Creators must disclose content that:

    Makes a real person appear to say or do something they didn’t do

    Alters footage of a real event or place

    Generates a realistic-looking scene that didn’t actually occur

    So, they want deepfakes to be clearly labeled, but if the entire video was scripted by chatgpt, the AI label is not required?

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Generates a realistic-looking scene that didn’t actually occur

      Doesn’t this describe, like, every mainstream live action film or television show?

    • HarkMahlberg@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Wouldn’t this enable, for example, Trump claiming he didn’t make the “bloodbath” comment, calling it a deepfake, and telling Youtube to remove all the new coverage of it? I mean, more generally, what stops someone from abusing this system?

  • CluckN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s a good first step. If claiming your AI video is real gets more views then I’m curious if the risks outweigh the cost of being caught.

    • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can only really pull that with older people and children. Most of us millennials can spot the patterns AI gen produces, but I’ve seen my dad just consume the content and be largely unaware of the fact that it was artificially generated. He constantly complains those videos say nothing but watches tons of them anyways, mostly related to non-news about sports.